Mapping the Indigenius (Madrid – Philippines, 1887)
Film-making Workshop with Kidlat Tahimik and Sally Gutiérrez

Held on 02 Nov 2021
In conjunction with the exhibition Magellan, Marilyn, Mickey & Fr. Dámaso. 500 Years of Conquistador RockStars (29 October 2021 – 6 March 2022), the Museo Reina Sofía organises a film-making workshop centred around colonial geographies and histories and directed by film-makers and artists Kidlat Tahimik (Philippines, 1942) and Sally Gutiérrez Dewar (Spain, 1965).
The workshop explores the colonial relations between Madrid and the Philippines at the end of the 19th century, setting out from a complex pattern of subjects, spaces and events. On one side, it foregrounds the figure of José Rizal (Philippines, 1861–1896), a man of letters and polymath, considered a hero of Philippine Independence, who spent a long period in Madrid and was the author of a distinguished collection of novels in Spanish. And on the other, the gaze returns to certain representative times and places in the Spanish capital: the Palacio de Cristal in the Retiro Park, which hosts the show and is the building conceived for the General Exhibition on the Philippine Islands in 1887; the National Anthropology Museum and its photographic archive, which conserves the largest collection of photographs on Igorot communities — indigenous people from the island of Luzon — and Muslim Filipinos from the island of Jolo, displayed as savages in a kind of human zoo in the aforementioned exhibition; and the Naval Museum, an institution with extensive cartographic and ethnographic heritage on the Philippines. The activity, moreover, combines field work and classroom analysis with the goal of producing a short film piece.
The workshop’s title alludes to the concept of indigenius, coined by Kidlat Tahimik after a mispronunciation of the term indigenous in English by one of his mentors, who unwittingly mixed the word with genius. For Tahimik this slip of the tongue expounds a singular culture based on hybridisation, in that although it is not possible to undo the history of colonisation, there is a need to question westernisation asserting the difference of precolonial culture.
Kidlat Tahimik — regarded as a pioneer in Philippine avant-garde film-making — and Sally Gutiérrez — notable for the coherence of her works on the Philippines — hail from different generations and backgrounds but share common ground with work that develops at the crossroads between essay film, contemporary fiction and critical narratives of colonialism.
Sally Gutiérrez Dewar (Madrid, 1965) is a film-maker and visual artist. Her work sits at the intersections between contemporary art, visual essay and documentary, with references that range from art history, film and gender studies to urban theory, social anthropology, political activism, poetry and literature. After studying at the New School and in the Study Program of the Whitney Museum of American Art, in New York, she now works as a lecturer at the European University of Madrid. Her feature-length films, for instance Tapologo, co-directed with her sister Gabriela Gutiérrez Dewar (2008) and Margen de error. ¿Cómo se escribe occidental? (with the collective Declinación Magnética, 2014), have been screened at different festivals, and in museums and art centres. Ta acorda ba tu el Filipinas? (Do You Remember the Philippines) was donated to the Museo Reina Sofía by Soledad Lorenzo in 2018. Her most recent works most notably include Camino Rizal (2021).
Kidlat Tahimik (Baguio, Philippines, 1942) is a film-maker and visual artist who is widely regarded as a pioneer of Filipino avant-garde film. His work originally and humorously fuses documentary, journal, autobiography, fiction and essay film to set forth a critique on globalisation and the developed world. Born as Eric Oteyza de Guia, he studied Economics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and worked for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OCDE) until 1968, the point at which he decided to move his life in another direction, changing his name to Kidlat Tahimik (silent lightning). His first film, Perfumed Nightmare (1977), won the FIPRESCI Prize in Berlin and was lauded by Susan Sontag and Francis Ford Coppola, turning it into a classic of international cinema. Retrospectives on his work have been held at the Mar del Plata International Film Festival, Berlinale and the Play-Doc Festival, among others.
Collaboration
Participants
Participants



Más actividades

All Time
Saturday, 25 April and 16 May 2026 — 7pm
As a recap of the previous sessions, this screening considers a geography of past and present struggles: a refined formal approach, a portrait of popular life, the landscape testimony of working communities and the critique of accumulation and inequality. The monumental diptych Too Early, Too Late (1982) reflects Engels’s sharp analysis of the French Revolution, along with the enumeration of the distribution of taxes on different hamlets in the French countryside. In the second part, the account of Mahmoud Hussein — a pseudonym for Egyptian Marxist historians Bahgat El Nadi and Adel Rifaat — ranges across the memory of anti-imperialist citizen revolts in Egypt throughout the twentieth century. The film destabilises stereotypes and common places of political insurgency in the North African country. Recovering and circulating this latent memory helps to name that which still resists being named and, as Straub y Huillet indicate, “making the revolution is to put very old yet forgotten things back in their place”.
Framed inside The Collection Screened is the programme Present Time: Insurgent Images, curated by Luis López Carrasco, a key film-maker with a distinguished international career. The works in the programme, selected from the Museo’s film and video collection, interlink projects that are conceptual, refined, systematic — as an X-ray of their time in history — with firebrand domestic and activist films, comprehending different political emergencies from the second half of the twentieth century in Europe and Latin America. These works are viewed in light of a genealogy of revolt which buries its roots in the nineteenth century.
![Joseph Kosuth. One and Three Chairs [Una y tres sillas]](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/joseph_kosuth.jpg.webp)
The (legal) person and the legal form. Chapter III
Monday 11, Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 May 2026 - Registration deadline extended
As part of the Studies Constellation, the Study Directoship’s annual fellowship, art historian and theorist Sven Lütticken leads the seminar The (Legal) Person and the Legal Form: Theoretical, Artistic, and Activist Commitments to foster dialogue and deepen the hypotheses and questions driving his research project.
The seminar consists of eight sessions, divided into three chapters throughout the academic year. While conceived as non-public spaces for discussion and collective work, these sessions complement, nourish, and amplify the public program of the Studies Constellation.
First session of the third chapter focuses on the transformation of the artwork in the context and wake of Conceptual art. The very notion of the artwork, together with its ownership and authenticity, is reconsidered from a broad perspective open to new and alternative models of management, which could ultimately transform the relationship between artist, artwork and owner. Can some of the practices in question serve as critical models? To what extent is it possible to think and act with them, and extrapolate from them, beyond a beautiful niche?
The second session turns to the question of representation. While many (but not all) human natural persons can, in principle, represent themselves in legal matters, other needs representatives. This goes for minors as well for adults who have been placed under legal guardianship; it applies to fictitious persons such as corporations and states, who need human representatives to sign contracts or defend them in court. We will look into the question of legal representation in conjunction with other forms of representation, in the cultural as well as political register—taking cues from Spivak’s distinction between portrait (Darstellung) and proxy (Vertretung), which is an unstable and historically mutable one.
The seminar concludes with a closing session dedicated to collectively revisiting and reflecting on the themes and discussions that have emerged throughout the first Studies Constellation Residency Program.

School of SUP: Trash Cinema Session
Thursday 30 April 2026 – 7pm
The deranged study plan by School of SUP, an equipo1821 development, brings to public attention their unique display of classwork with this screening. The session shows three short films made with analogue cameras, written and edited by and starring, collectively, students in pure DIY style, followed by a presentation of American SUP (2026), a feature-length and irreverent trash film by Soy una pringada and Dani Tezla.
American SUP (2026) is a US road trip through the American Midwest, recorded with a camera from 1997, in which YouTuber, DJ, cultural agitator and cult internet personality Soy una pringada and Dani Tezla direct and star in an adventure with no shortage of stellar appearances and impossible settings: the home of American Football, a corpse store, the Rainforest Café storm, a Cannibal Corpse gig, a basement in Minnesota, foul hotels, cuck chairs and a clown-filled hall of fame. The film is a lo-fi, folk-tinged version of American Gothic, a genre practised by film-makers such as George Kuchar, Harmony Korine and Sean Price Williams.
This session, moreover, is articulated with the core strands of the equipo1821 education programme School of SUP. Film, Art and Nihilism in the 1990s, which, through film — mainly from the 1990s — explores different underground practices, urban cultures, crossovers of art with popular culture and a kind of generational adolescent angst as background noise.
![Tracey Rose, The Black Sun Black Star and Moon [La luna estrella negro y negro sol], 2014.](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Obra/AD07091_2.jpg.webp)
On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination
27, 28, 29 ABR 2026
The seminar On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination proposes Black Study as a critical and methodological practice that has emerged in and against racial capitalism, colonial modernity and institutional capture. Framed through what the invited researcher and practitioner Ishy Pryce-Parchment terms a Black poethics of contamination, the seminar considers what it might mean to think Blackness (and therefore Black Study) as contagious, diffuse and spreadable matter. To do so, it enacts a constellation of diasporic methodologies and black aesthetic practices that harbor “contamination” -ideas that travel through texts, geographies, bodies and histories- as a method and as a condition.
If Blackness enters Western modernity from the position of the Middle Passage and its afterlives, it also names a condition from which alternative modes of being, knowing and relating are continually forged. From within this errant boundarylessness, Black creative-intellectual practice unfolds as what might be called a history of touches: transmissions, residues and socialities that unsettle the fantasy of pure or self-contained knowledge.
Situated within Black radical aesthetics, Black feminist theory and diasporic poetics, the seminar traces a genealogy of Black Study not as an object of analysis but as methodological propositions that continue to shape contemporary aesthetic and political life. Against mastery as the horizon of study, the group shifts attention from what we know to how we know. It foregrounds creative Black methodological practices—fahima ife’s anindex (via Fred Moten), Katherine McKittrick’s expansive use of the footnote, citation as relational and loving labour, the aesthetics of Black miscellanea, and Christina Sharpe’s practices of annotation—as procedures that disorganise dominant regimes of knowledge. In this sense, Black Study is approached not as a discrete academic field but as a feel for knowing and knowledge: a constellation of insurgent practices—reading, gathering, listening, annotating, refusing, world-making—that operate both within and beyond the university.
The study sessions propose to experiment with form in order to embrace how ‘black people have always used interdisciplinary methodologies to explain, explore, and story the world.’ Through engagements with thinkers and practitioners such as Katherine McKittrick, C.L.R. James, Sylvia Wynter, Christina Sharpe, Fred Moten, Tina Campt, Hilton Als, John Akomfrah, fahima ife and Dionne Brand, we ask: What might it mean to study together, incompletely and without recourse to individuation? How might aesthetic practice function as a poethical intervention in the ongoing work of what Sylvia Wynter calls the practice of doing humanness?


![Kidlat Tahimik. Sinong Lumikha ng Yoyo? Sinong Lumikha ng Moon Buggy? [¿Quién inventó el yoyó? ¿Quién inventó el vehículo lunar?]. Película, 1978](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/1_snippet_0.png.webp)
