
Mirtha Dermisache, Lectura Pública 7 (Public Reading 7), 2006
Museo Reina Sofía
Clinic 2628 is a project which supports and brings together writings which stem from the intention to offer a space and sustainable time for research work in art and culture. Framed within an academic context which is increasingly less receptive to the forms in which thinking happens and is expressed, the aim is to rescue the academic from its neoliberal trappings and thus recover the alliance between precision and intuition, work and desire. A further goal is to return writing to a commons which makes this possible through the monitoring of processes and the collectivisation of ideas, stances, references and strategies.
The endeavour, rooted in a collaboration between the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Directorship and the Artea research group, via the i+D Experimenta project, is shaped by three annual editions conceived as spaces of experimentation, discussion and a demonstration of writings critical of what is put forward by today’s academia.
What forces, forms and processes are at play when writing about art and aesthetics? In academia, in museums and in other cultural institutions, the practice of writing is traversed by productivist logics which jeopardise rhythms of research and experimentation. The imposition of both scientism inherent in the structure of “the paper” and the quantifying of results which demand a criterion of quality and visibility sterilise and smoothen, from the outset, the coarseness that is particular to writing understood from the concrete part of language: phonic, graphic, syntactic and grammatical resistance connecting the language user to the community the language unites and activates. They also sterilise the roughness enmeshed in the same desire to write, the intuitive, clear and confusing pathways that once again connect the writer to those reading and writing, participating in a common good that is at once discovered and produced.
The progressive commercialisation of knowledge propelled by cognitive capitalism moves further away from the research and production of knowledge in artworks and artistic languages and practices. The work of curators and archive, criticism, performances and essays formerly saw a horizon of formal and emotional possibilities, of imagination that was much broader when not developed in circumstances of competition, indexing and impact. Today, would it be possible to regain, critically not nostalgically, these ways; namely, recovering by forms, and by written forms, the proximity between art thinking and its objects? How to write in another way, to another rhythm, with no more demands than those with which an artwork moves towards different ways of seeing, reading and being in the world?
Managed and supported by
Erea Fernández and Arantxa Romero
Coordinated by
Ana Vidal González and Lola Visglerio Gómez
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía and ARTEA
Organised by

EXPERIMENTA. Project PID2023-148236NB-C21. Financed by Spain’s State Research Agency (AEI-MICIU) 10.13039/501100011033 and by FEDER, EU

Clinic, Year 1. Illegibility
A Call for Writings
The first edition of Clinic 2628 is predicated on the idea of illegibility, understood as artistic languages’ resistance to being absorbed by meanings and resulting in an affirmation of forms. Forms which, in not referring to a univocal and immediately legible message, initiate a process to produce meaning which creatively compromises the entire sphere involved in the aesthetic experience.
This way of understanding illegibility is underpinned in, on the one hand, avant-garde practices and intermedia and conceptual approaches which adopt writing because of its graphic performativity (Mallarmé, Ferrari, Hatherly, Broodthaers, Michaux, Ullán). On the other hand, it is anchored in the theoretical tradition of deviation, placing in dialogue formalist (Shklovsky), structuralist (Jakobson and Lotman) and post-structuralist (Deleuze, Derrida, Lacan, Barthes, Kristeva and Wittig) proposals to produce, historically from the 1970s onwards, a conceptual network in which notions of difference, supplementing, sliding, jouissance and dissidence point to a close relationship between aesthetics and ontology whenever art is conceived as a channel not solely of access and comprehension, but also of the production and transformation of reality.
This network of thought reaches contemporaneity to consider the role of art and writing in terms of the current colonial-extractivist phase of capitalism. Accordingly, operating within are notions such as “necro-writing” (Cristina Rivera Garza), “wrap” and “syncope” (Isabel de Naverán), the “analyrical” (María Salgado) and “difficulty” (Erea Fernández). In the same vein, and believing in the possibility of blurring art practice and theory, of interest here are the works of Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Hélène Cixous, Fred Moten, Lyn Hejinian and Cecilia Vicuña, among others.
Therefore, the Clinic is shaped, from these coordinates and desires, as a work space structured around three strands:
- Individual follow-up sessions: a remote session every two months to support each process of research and writing.
- Encounters of collective creation and process sharing: three in-person group sessions throughout the course (in February, May and October, in the afternoon) year held in the Museo’s Study Centre, and practices of thought and text production. The exact dates of the in-person sessions will be chosen within those months based on the availability of the members of the community.
- A guest-led annual workshop: in relation to a problem area convened in each edition.
Each course ends with processes of collective writing being opened to the public, while the supported writing realised over the three editions will be published in one volume at the end. Given that the aim is to create a small community and close-knit and measured dynamics, participants must commit to attending the encounters and refrain from releasing their own project before the publication.
Different working strands are put forward below to serve as guidance for applications. However, they do not constitute an exhaustive list of problem areas for participants:
- The aesthetic and political implications of illegibility in literature and art.
- Deviation, difficulty, opacity. Research from experimental practice.
- Artistic practices between writing and drawing: gestures, cryptography, imagined alphabets, graphology and corrections.
- Critical revisions of the post-structuralist legacy in the arts.
- Experimentation with the materiality of thought and visible-sound-legible tensions.
For any further questions, please write to clínicax2628x@gmail.com or centrodeestudios@museoreinasofia.es.
Más actividades

All Time
Saturday, 25 April and 16 May 2026 — 7pm
As a recap of the previous sessions, this screening considers a geography of past and present struggles: a refined formal approach, a portrait of popular life, the landscape testimony of working communities and the critique of accumulation and inequality. The monumental diptych Too Early, Too Late (1982) reflects Engels’s sharp analysis of the French Revolution, along with the enumeration of the distribution of taxes on different hamlets in the French countryside. In the second part, the account of Mahmoud Hussein — a pseudonym for Egyptian Marxist historians Bahgat El Nadi and Adel Rifaat — ranges across the memory of anti-imperialist citizen revolts in Egypt throughout the twentieth century. The film destabilises stereotypes and common places of political insurgency in the North African country. Recovering and circulating this latent memory helps to name that which still resists being named and, as Straub y Huillet indicate, “making the revolution is to put very old yet forgotten things back in their place”.
Framed inside The Collection Screened is the programme Present Time: Insurgent Images, curated by Luis López Carrasco, a key film-maker with a distinguished international career. The works in the programme, selected from the Museo’s film and video collection, interlink projects that are conceptual, refined, systematic — as an X-ray of their time in history — with firebrand domestic and activist films, comprehending different political emergencies from the second half of the twentieth century in Europe and Latin America. These works are viewed in light of a genealogy of revolt which buries its roots in the nineteenth century.
![Joan Colom, El carrer [La calle], 1960, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/coleccion-proyectada-5.jpg.webp)
Observation and Intervention
Friday, 24 April and 15 May 2026 — 7pm
If cinema does not set out to reach objectivity then each film takes a biased view of observed reality. The session begins with the seemingly neutral view of Cao Guimarães to observe a boy and girl playing in the rain in Da Janela do Meu Cuarto (From the Window of My Room, 2004). A work, deceptively relaxed, which prefigures one of the session’s constants: the place of childhood as a project of worlds to come. The boundless urban vitality of Barcelona Joan Colom portrays in El carrer (The Street, 1960) comes face to face with the extraordinary Niños (Children, 1974), by the Grupo de Cine Liberación sin Rodeos, a multi-voiced depiction of a group of friends in Cuzco whose citizen-focused schooling co-exists, just, with their daily work and reveals the limitations of the Revolutionary Government of the Armed Forces in Peru. Visión de la selva (View of the Jungle, 1973), by the same Peruvian collective, puts forward another model of representation and intervention on the public sphere with direct news activism, which denounces the plundering of the Amazon by multi-national companies.
Framed inside The Collection Screened is the programme Present Time: Insurgent Images, curated by Luis López Carrasco, a key film-maker with a distinguished international career. The works in the programme, selected from the Museo’s film and video collection, interlink projects that are conceptual, refined, systematic — as an X-ray of their time in history — with firebrand domestic and activist films, comprehending different political emergencies from the second half of the twentieth century in Europe and Latin America. These works are viewed in light of a genealogy of revolt which buries its roots in the nineteenth century.
![Video-Nou/Servei de Vídeo Comunitari, Ocaña. Exposició a la Galería Mec-Mec [Ocaña. Exposición en la Galería Mec-Mec], 1977, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/coleccion-proyectada-7.png.webp)
Daily Matter
Thursday, 23 April and 14 May 2026 — 7pm
Time, light, vision. What is an image? How does an image make us see the world? First, hypnosis, a reset: Paulino Viota’s Duración (Duration, 1970), the portrait of a clock face over sixty seconds. Next, a window into a slightly altered reality: Javier Aguirre’s Objetivo 40º (40 Degree Lens, 1968–1970). A minimum intervention that inspires a session considered as successive immersions in blocks of time, as well as a journey that starts from the intimacy of a candle, the movement of a car around abandoned peripheries and the traces of anti-Franco protestors, with night falling to the emotive, profound and sharp voice of Ocaña. Now in 1990, the journey ends at other street protests, those articulated by the Agustín Parejo School collective owing to the housing problem in Málaga. As Javier Aguirre states: “It is not about achieving the objective. It is about demystifying it”.
Framed inside The Collection Screened is the programme Present Time: Insurgent Images, curated by Luis López Carrasco, a key film-maker with a distinguished international career. The works in the programme, selected from the Museo’s film and video collection, interlink projects that are conceptual, refined, systematic — as an X-ray of their time in history — with firebrand domestic and activist films, comprehending different political emergencies from the second half of the twentieth century in Europe and Latin America. These works are viewed in light of a genealogy of revolt which buries its roots in the nineteenth century.
![Tracey Rose, The Black Sun Black Star and Moon [La luna estrella negro y negro sol], 2014.](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Obra/AD07091_2.jpg.webp)
On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination
27, 28, 29 ABR 2026
The seminar On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination proposes Black Study as a critical and methodological practice that has emerged in and against racial capitalism, colonial modernity and institutional capture. Framed through what the invited researcher and practitioner Ishy Pryce-Parchment terms a Black poethics of contamination, the seminar considers what it might mean to think Blackness (and therefore Black Study) as contagious, diffuse and spreadable matter. To do so, it enacts a constellation of diasporic methodologies and black aesthetic practices that harbor “contamination” -ideas that travel through texts, geographies, bodies and histories- as a method and as a condition.
If Blackness enters Western modernity from the position of the Middle Passage and its afterlives, it also names a condition from which alternative modes of being, knowing and relating are continually forged. From within this errant boundarylessness, Black creative-intellectual practice unfolds as what might be called a history of touches: transmissions, residues and socialities that unsettle the fantasy of pure or self-contained knowledge.
Situated within Black radical aesthetics, Black feminist theory and diasporic poetics, the seminar traces a genealogy of Black Study not as an object of analysis but as methodological propositions that continue to shape contemporary aesthetic and political life. Against mastery as the horizon of study, the group shifts attention from what we know to how we know. It foregrounds creative Black methodological practices—fahima ife’s anindex (via Fred Moten), Katherine McKittrick’s expansive use of the footnote, citation as relational and loving labour, the aesthetics of Black miscellanea, and Christina Sharpe’s practices of annotation—as procedures that disorganise dominant regimes of knowledge. In this sense, Black Study is approached not as a discrete academic field but as a feel for knowing and knowledge: a constellation of insurgent practices—reading, gathering, listening, annotating, refusing, world-making—that operate both within and beyond the university.
The study sessions propose to experiment with form in order to embrace how ‘black people have always used interdisciplinary methodologies to explain, explore, and story the world.’ Through engagements with thinkers and practitioners such as Katherine McKittrick, C.L.R. James, Sylvia Wynter, Christina Sharpe, Fred Moten, Tina Campt, Hilton Als, John Akomfrah, fahima ife and Dionne Brand, we ask: What might it mean to study together, incompletely and without recourse to individuation? How might aesthetic practice function as a poethical intervention in the ongoing work of what Sylvia Wynter calls the practice of doing humanness?

Situated Voices 38
Thursday, 23 April 2026 – 7pm
The Situated Voices programme offers de-hierarchised spaces of reflection and debate in which to generate, from situated experiences, collective knowledge in connection with present debates. With the title Climate Shelters for a Liveable City, this latest session looks to collectively address challenges around the accessibility of climate shelters in Madrid and to build a landscape of collaborative networks.
With the climate emergency, cities have become environments which are becoming harsher in the summer months due to high temperatures, exacerbated by concrete, and a lack of green spaces or cool, sheltered leisure areas not always bound up with consumerism. In recent years, community spaces and citizen and institutional collectives have started to organise “climate shelters”: accessible spaces providing shelter, shade, rest and relaxation to counter extreme climates, spaces which, faced with an increasingly chronic climate crisis, have proliferated in our cities as necessary, urgent places.
The previous experience of Climate Shelter. A Space for Rest, organised in the summer of 2025 by the Museo Reina Sofía, with the Museo Situado assembly, initiated a dialogue with other likeminded endeavours in the city. Therefore, this conversation seeks to gather their shared successes and challenges, particularly in that which refers to accessibility — and the consideration of exclusion and related solutions — with a view to thinking jointly about interventions for the summer of 2026. The encounter also touches on how to work in a network of collaboration: joining, supporting and connecting different climate shelters in Madrid, thinking collectively about how to respond to the climate crisis, the material realities approached in each project and meeting the specific needs of each context.
The networked organisation of climate shelters appears as a common horizon of resistance and organisation to tackle this eco-social crisis, a crisis that is no longer a future threat but a present condition which forces us to redefine ways of inhabiting the city.
