
Held on 14 May 2022
“Inside the museum, one remembers the good weather outside”, the poet and historian Ángel González said in relation to the dividing line, pivotal to modern cultural institutions, between art and nature, writing and life. Opposite this dissociation, of a biopolitical nature and determined by the supposed belonging of bodies to spaces, there is a search to imagine the emancipatory capacities of writing as a bioliterary force: a way of opening worlds through the aesthetic experience of language and the political experience of fiction. Thus, before disciplinary mechanisms this possible “writing for life” defends the capacity of writing to convene the parameters of an alternative reality and situate us — affectively, sensitively, intellectually — in another plane, creating in this same displacement the joint transformation of our lives in the world. Therefore, in duplicating and cancelling material conditions, investigating and denouncing them, forging alliances and invoking destinies, writing projects from the symbolic still allow us, as Walt Whitman would have wished, “to imagine being all people to be someone”. From such displacement, literature is regarded as an artform, as an articulation of imagery in language, of the history of writing, of bodies in language and biography in history.
Bioliteratures 1 is conceived as a series of sessions in which writing forms converge around authors whose careers defy distances between subject and language, between the self and us, between the public and the private. For this first session, made up of two round-table discussions, the literary work of Rafael Chirbes, which speaks to us of disarticulated and violent nature intrinsically constituting our times, has been selected. Is literature that does not make commitments truly committed literature? The memory of repression, the dignity of poverty, the suppression of memory, the marks of class on the body, crossed interests and desires, literary history as an alternative national history, polyphony as a factory of subjectivity and construction as a poetic legacy for a future democracy are themes which, from Chirbes’s literary world, still interrogate us.
This reflection on the author’s writings with critics, writers and readers leads to a more open relationship between his rich corpus of literature and essays being created, circumventing homage, mythification, the idea of the writer as an institution or the typically posthumous fallout following the reception of his Diarios [Diaries] (Anagrama, 2021). In putting forward the possibility of a role-author, we imagine modes of writing that capture the possibilities and contradictions of an era and ways of existing in it, our ghosts reflected in a body of language, glimpsed in motion like shadows by a river.
[dropdown]
David Becerra Mayor is a professor of Spanish Literature at the Autonomous University of Madrid. He has worked as a professor and post-doctoral researcher at Université de Liège and Université catholique in Louvain, and is the author of La novela de la no-ideología (Tierradenadie, 2013), La Guerra Civil como moda literaria (Clave Intelectual, 2015) and Después del acontecimiento. El retorno de lo político en la literatura española tras el 15-M (Bellaterra, 2021), and is coordinator of the monograph Convocando al fantasma. Novela crítica en la España actual (Tierradenadie ediciones, 2015). Furthermore, he has overseen the critical edition of La mina, by Armando López Salinas (AKAL, 2013), and Alejo Carpentier’s La consagración de la primavera (AKAL, 2015). He is the director of the collection of essays from the publishing house Hoja de Lata and is in charge of the Aesthetics and Literature Section at the Foundation for Marxist Studies.
Natalia Castro Picón is an assistant professor at Princeton University. She earned a degree in Hispanic Studies from the Complutense University of Madrid and a PhD from the City University of New York, and was a grantee at the Antonio Gala Foundation for young creators from 2013 to 2014. She has published the poetry collections La intermitencia de los faros (Canalla Ediciones, 2013) and La misma piedra (Tenerife, 2016), with her main fields of study modern and contemporary Iberian literature and culture, as well as transatlantic Iberian relations in a neoliberal context. In her research and classes, she combines tools and methods from Cultural Studies with a glottopolitical perspective.
Clara Derrac Soria is an art historian and researcher. She was a 2019–2021 Fulbright scholar and holds an MA in Modern and Contemporary Art: Critical and Curatorial Studies from the University of Columbia in New York and an MA in Contemporary Art History and Visual Culture from the Complutense University of Madrid, the Autonomous University of Madrid and Museo Reina Sofía. She is currently the beneficiary of a Banco de España – Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía grant for training in public activities projects inside the museum sphere.
Sara Mesa was born in Madrid but has lived in Seville since childhood. She is the author of six novels and three books of stories, most notably Cuatro por cuatro (2012, Herralde Prize finalist), Cicatriz (2015, RNE Critical Eye Award), Cara de pan (2018) and Un amor (selected as Book of the Year in 2020 in El País, El Cultural and La Vanguardia), as well as the volume of stories Mala letra (2016) and the essay Silencio administrativo. La pobreza en el laberinto burocrático (2019), all published by Anagrama. Her work has been translated into a dozen languages.
Rosario Peiró is head of the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections Area.
Juan Manuel Ruiz Casado holds a degree in Philology. His professional career encompasses journalism, gastronomy and viniculture, and he was previously editor-in-chief of the magazine Sobremesa and director of the tasting panel on the same publication. He is currently head of Enoteca Barolo’s tasting programme and activities.
Miguel Sánchez-Ostiz has worked as a poet, storyteller, essayist and columnist since 1977. He holds a degree in Law, working in advocacy from 1974 to the late 1980s. In 2001, he won the Prince of Viana Award for Culture. He is the author of an extensive bibliography, his novels most notably including La gran ilusión (Seix Barral, 1989, Euskadi Prize for Literature and the Herralde Prize for Fiction), Los papeles del ilusionista (Anagrama, 1990), No existe tal lugar (Anagrama, 1997, National Book Critics Award, 1998), La flecha del miedo (Anagrama, 2000), El Escarmiento (Pamiela, 2013), Perorata del insensato (Pamiela, 2015), Diablada boliviana (Pamiela, 2018), Moriremos nosotros también (Pamiela, 2021) and the literary memoirs Viaje alrededor de mi cuarto (Pamiela, 2021). In 2001, he published his entire corpus of poetry work to date in La marca del cuadrante (Pamiela, 2001). Notable among his studies and work on Pío Baroja are Derrotero de Pío Baroja (2000), Opiniones y paradojas (2000) and Pío Baroja, a escena (2006), Tiempos de tormenta (2007), and the editing and study of the unpublished novel Miserias de la guerra (2006). He also runs the blog Vivir de buena gana.
Rodrigo Terrasa is a journalist. He holds a degree in Information Sciences and started out as an intern at SuperDeporte, before moving on to El Mundo in Valencia as a staff writer in the Sports section. In 2007, he started to work on the digital edition of the newspaper and, in 2015, moved to the editorial department of El Mundo in Madrid to write about politics. At the present time, he writes for Papel, El Mundo’s daily magazine. He is also author of the book La ciudad de la euforia (Libros del K.O, 2021), chronicling some of the most infamous cases of corruption in the Community of Valencia over two decades.
Isabelle Touton is head professor of Spanish Language and Literature at the Université Bordeaux Montaigne, in Bordeaux. From Cultural Studies, she works on literature and Spanish visual literature (comics, graphic humour and documentary) and, with a sociological gaze, on the literary field, feminism and current Spanish social movements. Among other volumes, she is the author of Intrusas. 20 conversaciones con mujeres escritoras (Institución Fernando el Católico, 2018) and the editor, with Jorge Cagiao, of the collective book España después del 15M (Los Libros de la Catarata, 2019). She also recently co-directed the collective book Trazos de memoria, trozos de historia. Cómic y franquismo (Marmotilla, 2021).
[/dropdown]
Programme
Saturday, 14 May 2022
4:30pm Table 1. Reading and Writing to Rafael Chirbes
Participants
Sara Mesa. Writing Is to Open Our Gaze to the Half-light. Ideas and Style in Rafael Chirbes
David Becerra. Literature, Memory and Crisis. Reading from Rafael Chirbes
Isabelle Touton. Conflicts Created by the Work of Rafael Chirbes
Miguel Sánchez-Ostiz. Rafael Chirbes, from the Disappointment to the Pillory of His Time
Moderated by: Clara Derrac Soria
6:45pm Table 2. The Memory We Don’t Speak of
Participants:
Rodrigo Terrasa. Chirbes or the Structure of Power: Theory of a Collective Suicide
Natalia Castro Picón. The Artisan and the Museum. The Art of Hospitality in Rafael Chirbes
Juan Manuel Ruiz Casado. Damage as the Engine of Narration
Moderated by: Rosario Peiró
Participants
Participants
Más actividades
![Blake Edwards, The Party [El guateque], 1968, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-14.jpg.webp)
Blake Edwards. The Party
Thursday, 20 August 2026
In The Party, actor Hrundi V. Bakshi (Peter Sellers) is mistakenly invited to a glamorous dinner party in Hollywood. His curiosity and two left feet lead to one funny mishap after the other. During the soiree he consoles Michèle, a young actress who has been fired by her producer, and the chaos gathers momentum when Bakshi accidentally opens a retractable floor, making the guests fall into a swimming pool. A small hippie-style elephant gatecrashes the party, brought by a group of young people, and Bakshi asks the guests to wash the elephant as it is a sacred animal in his country. The house fills with soap suds, culminating in a wackily chaotic party.
When Stanley Kubrick was once asked who Peter Sellers was, he replied: “There is no such person as Peter Sellers”. The Party is one of the most widely recognised comedies in the history of film, its director Blake Edwards and the English actor making an entertaining critique of a fading conservative society. The cultural revolutions of the 1960s fit into the container of a choppy swimming pool: people from high society, an elephant, a Russian ballet, waiters, beatnik youth… similar to Sellers’s own identity: an empty vessel that can be refilled. In the film, Edwards tapped into the ingenious actor’s innate improvisation and the swimming pool as a container for revolutionary intent.

Lucrecia Martel. La ciénaga (The Swamp)
Viernes 21 de agosto, 2026
A couple of families spend the summer in a country cottage. The relationship between them exposes a crisis. The alcoholism of Mecha (Graciela Borges) and Gregorio (Martín Adjemián) becomes clear, leading to a drift in the education of their children and impacting relationships of respect and affect. Weariness expresses the lackadaisical environment.
In La ciénaga Lucrecia Martel approaches the decadence of a middle-class Argentinian family. The pool of dirty, stagnant water reflects the economic and social collapse of a whole country, yet reflects more than economic crisis as it becomes a murky well feeding off the pain of those living in the house. An erstwhile space of joy, the swimming pool becomes a reflection of adult depression, resulting in apathy. And the children, especially the girls, seem to be the only people awake in this drift. Barring a flicker of unawareness, the young people immerse themselves in rainwater or the water from the river, in water that flows, but are cautious of getting too close to the swimming pool.
![Yorgos Lanthimos, Kynodontas [Canino], 2009, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-16_00.jpg.webp)
Yorgos Lanthimos. Dogtooth
Saturday, 22 August 2026
A couple with three adult children live in a modern country cottage. A large swimming pool takes centre stage in a sizeable garden. The property is skirted by a large fence that blocks a view of the outside. Here, the father has educated his children without outside contact, maintaining their belief in a false world: aeroplanes fall in the garden like toys and they must act like dogs to defend themselves from the ferocious cats that surround the house. The promise of going out into the world when they lose their dogtooth is proof of their maturity.
Lanthimos builds a world that is surreal, comical and terrible. The swimming pool is the house’s central element, a limited, controlled space assimilated like the sea, yet under the father’s supervision. A space of imagination, but with sinister intentions: the children are indoctrinated under the water as they believe in a better world. Far from reality. The swimming pool’s limits are the limits of their freedom, a false state of well-being expressed in the weightless bodies in the water. The liquid element is an analgesic magma with the power to educate offspring under the latent fear of a shark bite.
![Binka Zhelyazkova, Baseynat [La piscina], 1977, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-17_00.png.webp)
Binka Zhelyazkova. The Swimming Pool
Viernes 28 de agosto, 2026
The young, bright Bella (Yanina Kasheva), after unforeseen heartbreak at her graduation party, meets Apostol (Kosta Tsonev), a reserved architect, and Boyan (Kliment Denchev), a comedy actor who is cynical about his country. The three characters climb up to a diving board in a municipal swimming pool, where they begin a strange relationship of friendship, love and despair which reflects a generational clash.
Binka Zhelyazkova, the great enfant terrible of Eastern European cinema, critic of the communist system and widely acclaimed film-maker beyond Bulgarian borders, made in The Swimming Pool a masterly metaphor for a country in decline. The public pool symbolises a closed, immovable enclosure where society is festering. From the height of a diving board she sees, in a panoptic view, the different generations living underneath a limited space. On one side, older people attempt to preserve the old revolutionary spirit with constant collective swimming exercises while, on the other, young people don’t hide the desire for freedom that remains unrealised. The result is an ideological clash in how to act and move in the enclosure, unearthing vast hypocrisy in the lost ideals of socialism, reflected in the total apathy of youth. The Swimming Pool for Zhelyazkova is a reflection of the disillusionment and existential void of a whole country and system.
![Jacques Deray, La piscine [La piscina], 1969, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-18.jpg.webp)
Jacques Deray. The Swimming Pool
Saturday, 29 August 2026
The characters played by Alain Delon (Jean-Paul) and Romy Schneider (Marianne) experience their love in apparent splendour. A sun-drenched house, a blissful swimming pool, beautiful bodies, sexuality in abundance. The visit of Harry (Maurice Ronet), a successful musician, friend of Jean-Paul and ex-lover of Marianne, accompanied by his young and beautiful daughter Penélope (Jane Birkin), rocks their relationship, bringing to light the jealousy and insecurities of each one in a dark game of possession and male rivalry.
If there was a definition of the glistening blue pool in this sexual thriller, it would be the paradise of Adam and Eve, represented by the shots of happiness of Romy Schneider and Alain Delon in this swimming pool on France’s Côte d’Azur. The appearance of these two beautiful creatures kissing semi-naked by the water is one of film’s resonant images. The paradise cannot be fractured, not even by death. As in the crossing of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, where humanity’s first lovers bathed naked in the water, innocent to their imminent end, the reflection of the crystalline water of The Swimming Pool shows this game, and the deep traumas which, under this mantle, are hidden in the amorous relationships and limits that only love is capable of breaking to solve.
In this session both endings to the film are screened: the original version, open and symbolic, and the Spanish version, marked by censorship during Francoism, and its sequence for a Spanish premiere — a stereotypical and reductive vision reflecting the sociological condition of the country.
