
Held on 14 May 2022
“Inside the museum, one remembers the good weather outside”, the poet and historian Ángel González said in relation to the dividing line, pivotal to modern cultural institutions, between art and nature, writing and life. Opposite this dissociation, of a biopolitical nature and determined by the supposed belonging of bodies to spaces, there is a search to imagine the emancipatory capacities of writing as a bioliterary force: a way of opening worlds through the aesthetic experience of language and the political experience of fiction. Thus, before disciplinary mechanisms this possible “writing for life” defends the capacity of writing to convene the parameters of an alternative reality and situate us — affectively, sensitively, intellectually — in another plane, creating in this same displacement the joint transformation of our lives in the world. Therefore, in duplicating and cancelling material conditions, investigating and denouncing them, forging alliances and invoking destinies, writing projects from the symbolic still allow us, as Walt Whitman would have wished, “to imagine being all people to be someone”. From such displacement, literature is regarded as an artform, as an articulation of imagery in language, of the history of writing, of bodies in language and biography in history.
Bioliteratures 1 is conceived as a series of sessions in which writing forms converge around authors whose careers defy distances between subject and language, between the self and us, between the public and the private. For this first session, made up of two round-table discussions, the literary work of Rafael Chirbes, which speaks to us of disarticulated and violent nature intrinsically constituting our times, has been selected. Is literature that does not make commitments truly committed literature? The memory of repression, the dignity of poverty, the suppression of memory, the marks of class on the body, crossed interests and desires, literary history as an alternative national history, polyphony as a factory of subjectivity and construction as a poetic legacy for a future democracy are themes which, from Chirbes’s literary world, still interrogate us.
This reflection on the author’s writings with critics, writers and readers leads to a more open relationship between his rich corpus of literature and essays being created, circumventing homage, mythification, the idea of the writer as an institution or the typically posthumous fallout following the reception of his Diarios [Diaries] (Anagrama, 2021). In putting forward the possibility of a role-author, we imagine modes of writing that capture the possibilities and contradictions of an era and ways of existing in it, our ghosts reflected in a body of language, glimpsed in motion like shadows by a river.
[dropdown]
David Becerra Mayor is a professor of Spanish Literature at the Autonomous University of Madrid. He has worked as a professor and post-doctoral researcher at Université de Liège and Université catholique in Louvain, and is the author of La novela de la no-ideología (Tierradenadie, 2013), La Guerra Civil como moda literaria (Clave Intelectual, 2015) and Después del acontecimiento. El retorno de lo político en la literatura española tras el 15-M (Bellaterra, 2021), and is coordinator of the monograph Convocando al fantasma. Novela crítica en la España actual (Tierradenadie ediciones, 2015). Furthermore, he has overseen the critical edition of La mina, by Armando López Salinas (AKAL, 2013), and Alejo Carpentier’s La consagración de la primavera (AKAL, 2015). He is the director of the collection of essays from the publishing house Hoja de Lata and is in charge of the Aesthetics and Literature Section at the Foundation for Marxist Studies.
Natalia Castro Picón is an assistant professor at Princeton University. She earned a degree in Hispanic Studies from the Complutense University of Madrid and a PhD from the City University of New York, and was a grantee at the Antonio Gala Foundation for young creators from 2013 to 2014. She has published the poetry collections La intermitencia de los faros (Canalla Ediciones, 2013) and La misma piedra (Tenerife, 2016), with her main fields of study modern and contemporary Iberian literature and culture, as well as transatlantic Iberian relations in a neoliberal context. In her research and classes, she combines tools and methods from Cultural Studies with a glottopolitical perspective.
Clara Derrac Soria is an art historian and researcher. She was a 2019–2021 Fulbright scholar and holds an MA in Modern and Contemporary Art: Critical and Curatorial Studies from the University of Columbia in New York and an MA in Contemporary Art History and Visual Culture from the Complutense University of Madrid, the Autonomous University of Madrid and Museo Reina Sofía. She is currently the beneficiary of a Banco de España – Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía grant for training in public activities projects inside the museum sphere.
Sara Mesa was born in Madrid but has lived in Seville since childhood. She is the author of six novels and three books of stories, most notably Cuatro por cuatro (2012, Herralde Prize finalist), Cicatriz (2015, RNE Critical Eye Award), Cara de pan (2018) and Un amor (selected as Book of the Year in 2020 in El País, El Cultural and La Vanguardia), as well as the volume of stories Mala letra (2016) and the essay Silencio administrativo. La pobreza en el laberinto burocrático (2019), all published by Anagrama. Her work has been translated into a dozen languages.
Rosario Peiró is head of the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections Area.
Juan Manuel Ruiz Casado holds a degree in Philology. His professional career encompasses journalism, gastronomy and viniculture, and he was previously editor-in-chief of the magazine Sobremesa and director of the tasting panel on the same publication. He is currently head of Enoteca Barolo’s tasting programme and activities.
Miguel Sánchez-Ostiz has worked as a poet, storyteller, essayist and columnist since 1977. He holds a degree in Law, working in advocacy from 1974 to the late 1980s. In 2001, he won the Prince of Viana Award for Culture. He is the author of an extensive bibliography, his novels most notably including La gran ilusión (Seix Barral, 1989, Euskadi Prize for Literature and the Herralde Prize for Fiction), Los papeles del ilusionista (Anagrama, 1990), No existe tal lugar (Anagrama, 1997, National Book Critics Award, 1998), La flecha del miedo (Anagrama, 2000), El Escarmiento (Pamiela, 2013), Perorata del insensato (Pamiela, 2015), Diablada boliviana (Pamiela, 2018), Moriremos nosotros también (Pamiela, 2021) and the literary memoirs Viaje alrededor de mi cuarto (Pamiela, 2021). In 2001, he published his entire corpus of poetry work to date in La marca del cuadrante (Pamiela, 2001). Notable among his studies and work on Pío Baroja are Derrotero de Pío Baroja (2000), Opiniones y paradojas (2000) and Pío Baroja, a escena (2006), Tiempos de tormenta (2007), and the editing and study of the unpublished novel Miserias de la guerra (2006). He also runs the blog Vivir de buena gana.
Rodrigo Terrasa is a journalist. He holds a degree in Information Sciences and started out as an intern at SuperDeporte, before moving on to El Mundo in Valencia as a staff writer in the Sports section. In 2007, he started to work on the digital edition of the newspaper and, in 2015, moved to the editorial department of El Mundo in Madrid to write about politics. At the present time, he writes for Papel, El Mundo’s daily magazine. He is also author of the book La ciudad de la euforia (Libros del K.O, 2021), chronicling some of the most infamous cases of corruption in the Community of Valencia over two decades.
Isabelle Touton is head professor of Spanish Language and Literature at the Université Bordeaux Montaigne, in Bordeaux. From Cultural Studies, she works on literature and Spanish visual literature (comics, graphic humour and documentary) and, with a sociological gaze, on the literary field, feminism and current Spanish social movements. Among other volumes, she is the author of Intrusas. 20 conversaciones con mujeres escritoras (Institución Fernando el Católico, 2018) and the editor, with Jorge Cagiao, of the collective book España después del 15M (Los Libros de la Catarata, 2019). She also recently co-directed the collective book Trazos de memoria, trozos de historia. Cómic y franquismo (Marmotilla, 2021).
[/dropdown]
Programme
Saturday, 14 May 2022
4:30pm Table 1. Reading and Writing to Rafael Chirbes
Participants
Sara Mesa. Writing Is to Open Our Gaze to the Half-light. Ideas and Style in Rafael Chirbes
David Becerra. Literature, Memory and Crisis. Reading from Rafael Chirbes
Isabelle Touton. Conflicts Created by the Work of Rafael Chirbes
Miguel Sánchez-Ostiz. Rafael Chirbes, from the Disappointment to the Pillory of His Time
Moderated by: Clara Derrac Soria
6:45pm Table 2. The Memory We Don’t Speak of
Participants:
Rodrigo Terrasa. Chirbes or the Structure of Power: Theory of a Collective Suicide
Natalia Castro Picón. The Artisan and the Museum. The Art of Hospitality in Rafael Chirbes
Juan Manuel Ruiz Casado. Damage as the Engine of Narration
Moderated by: Rosario Peiró
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Programme
Bioliteraturas
Educational program developed with the sponsorship of

Participants
Participants
Más actividades

Aesthetics of Peace and Desertion Tactics
8 October 2025 – 24 June 2026
The study group Aesthetics of Peace and Tactics of Desertion: Prefiguring New Pacifisms and Forms of Transitional Justice proposes a rethinking—through both a theoretical-critical and historical-artistic lens—of the intricate network of concepts and practices operating under the notion of pacifism. A term not without contestation and critical tension, pacifism gathers under its name a multiplicity of practices—from anti-militarism and anti-war movements to non-violence activism—while simultaneously opening urgent debates around violence, justice, reparation, and desertion. Here, pacifism is not conceived as a moral doctrine, but as an active form of ethical and political resistance capable of generating aesthetic languages and new positions of social imagination.
Through collective study, the group seeks to update critical debates surrounding the use of violence and non-violence, as well as to explore the conflict of their representation at the core of visual cultures. In a present marked by rearmament, war, genocide, and the collapse of the social contract, this group aims to equip itself with tools to, on one hand, map genealogies and aesthetics of peace—within and beyond the Spanish context—and, on the other, analyze strategies of pacification that have served to neutralize the critical power of peace struggles. Transitional and anti-punitive justice proposals will also be addressed, alongside their intersections with artistic, visual, and cinematic practices. This includes examining historical examples of tribunals and paralegal activisms initiated by artists, and projects where gestures, imaginaries, and vocabularies tied to justice, reparation, memory, and mourning are developed.
It is also crucial to note that the study programme is grounded in ongoing reflection around tactics and concepts drawn, among others, from contemporary and radical Black thought—such as flight, exodus, abolitionism, desertion, and refusal. In other words, strategies and ideas that articulate ways of withdrawing from the mandates of institutions or violent paradigms that must be abandoned or dismantled. From feminist, internationalist, and decolonial perspectives, these concepts have nourished cultural coalitions and positions whose recovery today is urgent in order to prefigure a new pacifism: generative, transformative, and radical.
Aesthetics of Peace and Tactics of Desertion, developed and led by the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Management, unfolds through biweekly sessions from October to June. These sessions alternate between theoretical discussions, screenings, work with artworks and archival materials from the Museo’s Collection, reading workshops, and public sessions. The group is structured around sustained methodologies of study, close reading, and collective discussion of thinkers such as Judith Butler, Elsa Dorlin, Juan Albarrán, Rita Segato, Sven Lütticken, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, and Franco “Bifo” Berardi; historical episodes such as the anti-nuclear and anti-arms race movement in Spain; and the work of artists and activists including Rojava Film Commune, Manuel Correa and the Oficina de Investigación Documental (Office for Documentary Investigation), and Jonas Staal, among other initial cases that will expand as the group progresses.

Institutional Decentralisation
Thursday, 21 May 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
This fourth and final session centres on films that take the museum away from its axis and make it gaze from the edges. Pieces that work with that which is normally left out: peripheral territories, unpolished aesthetics, clumsy gestures full of intent. Instead of possessing an institutional lustre, here they are rough, precarious and strange in appearance, legitimate forms of making and showing culture. The idea is to think about what happens when central authority is displaced, when the ugly and the uncomfortable are not hidden, when they are recognised as part of the commons. Film that does not seek to be to one’s liking, but to open space and allow other ways of seeing and inhabiting the museum to enter stage.

Intergenerationality
Thursday, 9 April 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
The third session gazes at film as a place from which to dismantle the idea of one sole history and one sole time. From a decolonial and queer perspective, it explores films which break the straight line of past-present-future, which mix memories, slow progress and leave space for rhythms which customarily make no room for official accounts. Here the images open cracks through which bodies, voices and affects appear, disrupting archive and questioning who narrates, and from where and for whom. The proposal is at once simple and ambitious: use film to imagine other modes of remembering, belonging and projecting futures we have not yet been able to live.

Remedios Zafra
Thursday March 19, 2026 - 19:00 h
The José Luis Brea Chair, dedicated to reflecting on the image and the epistemology of visuality in contemporary culture, opens its program with an inaugural lecture by essayist and thinker Remedios Zafra.
“That the contemporary antifeminist upsurge is constructed as an anti-intellectual drive is no coincidence; the two feed into one another. To advance a reactionary discourse that defends inequality, it is necessary to challenge gender studies and gender-equality policies, but also to devalue the very foundations of knowledge in which these have been most intensely developed over recent decades—while also undermining their institutional support: universities, art and research centers, and academic culture.
Feminism has been deeply linked to the affirmation of the most committed humanist thought. Periods of enlightenment and moments of transition toward more just social forms—sustained by education—have been when feminist demands have emerged most strongly. Awareness and achievements in equality increase when education plays a leading social role; thus, devaluing intellectual work also contributes to harming feminism, and vice versa, insofar as the bond between knowledge and feminism is not only conceptual and historical, but also intimate and political.
Today, antifeminism is used globally as the symbolic adhesive of far-right movements, in parallel with the devaluation of forms of knowledge emerging from the university and from science—mistreated by hoaxes and disinformation on social networks and through the spectacularization of life mediated by screens. These are consequences bound up with the primacy of a scopic value that for some time has been denigrating thought and positioning what is most seen as what is most valuable within the normalized mediation of technology. This inertia coexists with techno-libertarian proclamations that reactivate a patriarchy that uses the resentment of many men as a seductive and cohesive force to preserve and inflame privileges in the new world as techno-scenario.
This lecture will address this epochal context, delving into the synchronicity of these upsurges through an additional parallel between forms of patriarchal domination and techno-labor domination. A parallel in which feminism and intellectual work are both being harmed, while also sending signals that in both lie emancipatory responses to today’s reactionary turns and the neutralization of critique. This consonance would also speak to how the perverse patriarchal basis that turns women into sustainers of their own subordination finds its equivalent in the encouraged self-exploitation of cultural workers; in the legitimation of affective capital and symbolic capital as sufficient forms of payment; in the blurring of boundaries between life and work and in domestic isolation; or in the pressure to please and comply as an extended patriarchal form—today linked to the feigned enthusiasm of precarious workers, but also to technological adulation. In response to possible resistance and intellectual action, patriarchy has associated feminists with a future foretold as unhappy for them, equating “thought and consciousness” with unhappiness—where these have in fact been (and continue to be) levers of autonomy and emancipation.”
— Remedios Zafra

27th Contemporary Art Conservation Conference
Wednesday, 4, and Thursday, 5 March 2026
The 27th Contemporary Art Conservation Conference, organised by the Museo Reina Sofía’s Department of Conservation and Restoration, with the sponsorship of the Mapfre Foundation, is held on 4 and 5 March 2026. This international encounter sets out to share and debate experience and research, open new channels of study and reflect on conservation and the professional practice of restorers.
This edition will be held with in-person and online attendance formats, occurring simultaneously, via twenty-minute interventions followed by a five-minute Q&A.