-
5 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Colloquium. Amos Gitai, in conversation with Jean-François Chevrier
This event serves as an introduction to both the film series and the exhibition dedicated to the filmmaker. With a notion of documentary as a poetic tale of resistance, the work of Amos Gitai has profound links with the narration of place using life experience, an aspect that lends structure to the exhibitions Biographical Forms and The Biographies of Amos Gitai, both curated by Jean-François Chevrier.
-
6 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 1. Architecture and House
House
1980, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 51’Architecture
1978, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 13’15House, or Baït according to the common transcription of the Arabic and Hebrew words, is the story of a house in West Jerusalem. The home belonged to a Palestinian family until the war in 1948 that, with the founding of the state of Israel, forced its owners into exile. At the time of the filming, the house is in the process of being enlarged. The film features the voices of the successive owners and renters (from 1956 onwards) and also that of the previous owner, Mahmud Dajani, a Palestinian doctor who must live with the errors of the radicalism of his defeated compatriots. Some neighbours recount their memories. A Palestinian worker denounces his working conditions and Israeli domination of the occupied territories.
Two years earlier Gitai had directed what he himself called his last film on architecture, Architecture, which was shot in Haifa. The International Style, which his father the architect Munio Weinraub Gitai (1907-1970) followed, is denounced by means of a comparison with vernacular forms of construction.
-
11 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 2. Field Diary
Field Diary
1982, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 83’This film examines the legitimisation of the violence used against the Palestinians: It is the story of the occupier’s inability to face up to his own actions, taking refuge in abstractions (God, the Nation, Security) and turning that into a mechanism for legitimising what he does , in the words of Gitai. The filming began three months before the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The film describes the escalation of violence and how it becomes installed in people’s mentalities. The takes are long and the film is made up of sequences that are dramatic units in themselves. Various sequences are devoted to a visit with the mayor of Nablus, who is under home arrest. The dramatic argument resides in the confrontation between the witness-filmmaker (the small crew behind the camera) and the police forces (the army) and the revelation of the effects that nationalist propaganda has on young Israeli soldiers.
-
12 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 3. Pineapple
Pineapple
1983, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 78’This film is an inquiry into the methods of rationalisation and exploitation used by multinationals in today's global economy. The example studied is a pineapple-producing company with headquarters in Honolulu , a distribution subsidiary in San Francisco , and croplands in Hawaii , although cultivation is in the process of being outsourced to the Philippines . The voices are those of the people involved in this system: upper and middle level management, foremen and workers, in the fields and in the packaging facilities. Part of the “packaging” is also the Christian moral propaganda that allows order to be maintained without physical violence.
-
13 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 4. Bangkok-Bahrain. Labour for sale
Bangkok-Bahrain. Labour for sale
1984, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 78’
Shot one year after Pineapple, this documentary is an uncomfortable look at the extreme forms of modern slavery existing in Thailand: prostitution and the trade in labourers hired for jobs in the Persian Gulf. The film gives a voice to the people who benefit from this exploitation. It also attempts to overcome the silence imposed on both prostitutes and emigrant workers. Enslaved bodies are given words under coercion. The film points out the obstacles to these people telling their story, a minimum condition of identity and a means towards emancipation.
-
17 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 5. Esther
Esther
1985, 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 97' Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisEsther is Gitai’s first fiction film. Conceived as an immense tableau vivant , it tells the Old Testament story of Esther. The film was shot in the ruins of Haifa ’s old Arab quarter, Wadi Salib, where Palestinians lived until 1948. The neighbourhood was destroyed in 1959 as a result of a rebellion by the newly-arrived Sephardic population against the power monopoly held by the Ashkenazi community. This historical stratification becomes the setting for the biblical tale, which tells of the struggle by the Hebrew people to survive in the Persian Empire . In the end violence is exercised also by those who have been oppressed. But the film concludes with a return to the present: each of the main actors tells his or her own story.
-
18 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 6. A House in Jerusalem
A House in Jerusalem
1998, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 85’Eighteen years after his first feature film, Gitai returned to the locations of House and resumed his investigation: the time of a generation has passed, Mahmud Dajani is now dead, his son has adopted Canadian nationality and his granddaughter says she is moving to Canada. The film’s territory has become larger, it is now about several houses instead of just one. An Englishman and a Swedish woman have moved into the neighbourhood. Palestinian workers , Gitai comments, discover Jewish archaeological sites that will later be used to justify the expulsion of the Palestinians.
-
19 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 7. Kippur
Kippur
2000, 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 120' Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisOn October 11th, 1973, during the Yom Kippur war, the helicopter Gitai was aboard was shot down by a missile. The film reconstructs the episode and the circumstances surrounding it, beginning with the declaration of war. Kippur is one of the best examples of the war film genre in recent filmmaking. The war is shown to be a present time inscribed in people’s gestures, a present that takes over bodies and impregnates biographies. The images have a great physical presence; the sound is imposing, horrific. I tried to create an ongoing bombardment of sound. I wanted people to feel that the episode is beyond the camera’s control, that it exceeds our field of vision , states Gitai.
-
24 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 8. News from Home/News from House
News from Home/News from House
2005. 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 97’ Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisAt the beginning of this film, a sign says: This film, House , has been filmed three times over the past twenty-five years. This tends to make one think that the three films devoted to this house in Jerusalem are but one. Gitai suggests as well that the cinematographic story absorbs the time period. The film is shown to be akin to a construction taking place over time and history. In the words of the filmmaker: In a way, documentaries are something like a human archaeological site, I think this is the function of documentaries in general: to excavate, to make the plan as a whole appear, to reveal the structure masked by the present (…). Layer by layer we see the characters arriving: workers, owners, people bringing little things, fragments of memories, events, photographs.
-
26 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 9. Carmel
Carmel <
2009, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 93’Carmel is one of the two films that Gitai has dedicated recently to his parents. The main character is Efratia Margalit Gitai. She passed away in 2004, having been born in 1909 in Palestine, (Haifa) to parents recently emigrated from central Europe. She married the architect Munio Weinraub Gitai in 1936. The film, conceived as a poetic montage of documents and acted sequences, reconstructs the key moments in Efratia’s life, but also in the life of Amos, as a child and then as an adult, in relation with his own children. The documentary material comprises essentially family photos and letters read by actors, with the addition of a fragment of film-memory shot in super 8. The archaeological form of House is found here as an elegy. Carmel is the name of the mountain looming over Haifa.

Held on 05, 06, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 24, 26 feb 2014
This series spans more than thirty years of activity by Amos Gitai, beginning with Architecture, a short film from 1978. This film, made when the filmmaker still planned to pursue a career in architecture, already contained signs of the critical dimension that would be confirmed in his later documentaries. Gitai became a filmmaker when he made House in 1980. With its return visits and continuations in 1998 (A House in Jerusalem) and 2005 (News from Home/News from House), this film can be likened to a coming-of-age novel of an architect-filmmaker. It tells the story of a dispossession, from the vantage point of the house’s former owner, a Palestinian forced to leave in 1948. The current circumstances of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are seen in the builders’ living and working conditions in 1980.
For Gitai, the present is inscribed in a time period and also in a historical stratum. The blending of these two approaches, which constitutes the principal strength of his documentary films, is also seen in his fiction works, such as Esther (1985), Kippur (2000) and Carmel (2009). Long sequence shots, which express a kind of continuity, are inserted into a montage of fragmentary and at times dissonant shots. The story, with its biographical or autobiographical content, encompasses and overcomes the documentary/fiction distinction upon which cinematic discourse still rests and which Gitai takes apart.
House illustrates that the dramatic processes of documentary film are analogous to the constructive methods of an architect. The construction of the film responds to the transformation of the house. The quarry from which the Palestinian workers extract the stone is an allegorical place. The power relations characteristic of the world of labour are related to a situation of political domination, based on the appropriation of territory.
Produced in Israel by a television network, the film has never been distributed in that country. But Field Diary, shot in March of 1982, just before the war with Lebanon, did lead to a climate of hate, as Gitai described it, that prompted him to take exile in France. Pineapple and Bangkok-Bahrain were made from this position of distance. The two films use investigative reporting practices and constitute a diptych on the networks of exploitation and servitude at the international level.
The central question explored by Gitai’s work, and found throughout the nine features and the short film that make up this series, is the construction/violence relation, particularly vivid for an architect-filmmaker in a country in which territorial conflicts are always accompanied by acts of construction and destruction. Constructions appear as the response to or the prolongation of violence. Like violence, construction is material, physical yet it also has a symbolic dimension. That is why his films are an ensemble of elements that take on meaning in the course of a story, inside a film or from one film to another. Gitai is an architect-filmmaker, but he is also a biographer-filmmaker. His life is one of the biographies that make up an open-ended opus, an opus under construction.
Más actividades
Aesthetics of Peace and Desertion Tactics
8, 22 OCT, 5, 19 NOV, 3, 17, 31 DIC 2025,14, 28 ENE, 11, 25 FEB, 11, 25 MAR, 8, 22 ABR, 6, 20 MAY, 3, 17 JUN 2026
The study group Aesthetics of Peace and Tactics of Desertion: Prefiguring New Pacifisms and Forms of Transitional Justice proposes a rethinking—through both a theoretical-critical and historical-artistic lens—of the intricate network of concepts and practices operating under the notion of pacifism. A term not without contestation and critical tension, pacifism gathers under its name a multiplicity of practices—from anti-militarism and anti-war movements to non-violence activism—while simultaneously opening urgent debates around violence, justice, reparation, and desertion. Here, pacifism is not conceived as a moral doctrine, but as an active form of ethical and political resistance capable of generating aesthetic languages and new positions of social imagination.
Through collective study, the group seeks to update critical debates surrounding the use of violence and non-violence, as well as to explore the conflict of their representation at the core of visual cultures. In a present marked by rearmament, war, genocide, and the collapse of the social contract, this group aims to equip itself with tools to, on one hand, map genealogies and aesthetics of peace—within and beyond the Spanish context—and, on the other, analyze strategies of pacification that have served to neutralize the critical power of peace struggles. Transitional and anti-punitive justice proposals will also be addressed, alongside their intersections with artistic, visual, and cinematic practices. This includes examining historical examples of tribunals and paralegal activisms initiated by artists, and projects where gestures, imaginaries, and vocabularies tied to justice, reparation, memory, and mourning are developed.
It is also crucial to note that the study programme is grounded in ongoing reflection around tactics and concepts drawn, among others, from contemporary and radical Black thought—such as flight, exodus, abolitionism, desertion, and refusal. In other words, strategies and ideas that articulate ways of withdrawing from the mandates of institutions or violent paradigms that must be abandoned or dismantled. From feminist, internationalist, and decolonial perspectives, these concepts have nourished cultural coalitions and positions whose recovery today is urgent in order to prefigure a new pacifism: generative, transformative, and radical.
Aesthetics of Peace and Tactics of Desertion, developed and led by the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Management, unfolds through biweekly sessions from October to June. These sessions alternate between theoretical discussions, screenings, work with artworks and archival materials from the Museo’s Collection, reading workshops, and public sessions. The group is structured around sustained methodologies of study, close reading, and collective discussion of thinkers such as Judith Butler, Elsa Dorlin, Juan Albarrán, Rita Segato, Sven Lütticken, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, and Franco “Bifo” Berardi; historical episodes such as the anti-nuclear and anti-arms race movement in Spain; and the work of artists and activists including Rojava Film Commune, Manuel Correa and the Oficina de Investigación Documental (Office for Documentary Investigation), and Jonas Staal, among other initial cases that will expand as the group progresses.
Rethinking Guernica
21, 28, 22, 29 SEP, 5, 12, 19, 26, 6, 13, 20, 27 OCT, 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, 3, 10, 17, 24 NOV, 7, 14, 21, 28, 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 DIC 2025
This guided tour activates the microsite Rethinking Guernica, a research project developed by the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections Area, Conservation and Restoration Department and the Digital Projects Area of the Editorial Activities Department, assembling around 2,000 documents, interviews and counter-archives related to Pablo Picasso’s painting Guernica (1937).
The visit sets out an in-situ dialogue between the works hung around the painting and a selection of key documents, selected by the Museo’s Education Team and essential to gaining an idea of the picture’s historical background. Therefore, the tour looks to contribute to activating critical thought around this iconic and perpetually represented work and seeks to foster an approach which refreshes our gaze before the painting, thereby establishing a link with the present. Essentially revisiting to rethink Guernica.
UP/ROOTING
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 NOV 2025
Museo Reina Sofía and MACBA Museu d'Art Contemporani de Barcelona (MACBA) invite applications for the 2025 iteration of the School of Common Knowledge, which will take place from November 11th to 16th in Madrid and Barcelona.
The School of Common Knowledge (SCK) draws on the network, knowledge and experience of L’Internationale, a confederation of museums, art organizations and universities that strives to reimagine and practice internationalism, solidarity and communality within the cultural field. This year, the SCK program focuses on the contested and dynamic notions of rooting and uprooting in the framework of present —colonial, migrant, situated, and ecological— complexities.
Building on the legacy of the Glossary of Common Knowledge and the current European program Museum of the Commons, the SCK invites participants to reflect on the power of language to shape our understanding of art and society through a co-learning methodology. Its ambition is to be both nomadic and situated, looking at specific cultural and geopolitical situations while exploring their relations and interdependencies with the rest of the world.
In the current context fraught with war and genocide, the criminalization of migration and hyper-identitarianism, concepts such as un/belonging become unstable and in need of collective rethinking:
How can we reframe the sense and practice of belonging away from reductive nationalist paradigms or the violence of displacement? How to critically hold the entanglement of the colonial routes and the cultural roots we are part of? What do we do with the toxic legacies we inherit? And with the emancipatory genealogies and practices that we choose to align with? Can a renewed practice of belonging and coalition-making through affinity be part of a process of dis/identification? What geographies —cultural, artistic, political— do these practices of de/centering, up/rooting, un/belonging and dis/alignment designate?
Departing from these questions, the program consists of a series of visits to situated initiatives (including Museo Situado, Paisanaje and MACBA's Kitchen, to name a few), engagements with the exhibitions and projects on view (Project a Black Planet: The Art and Culture from Panafrica), a keynote lecture by Stefano Harney and Fred Moten, as well as daily reading and discussion gatherings, editorial harvest sessions, and conviviality moments.
The (legal) person and the legal form. Chapter I
2, 6, 9 OCT 2025
As part of the Studies Constellation, the Study Directoship’s annual fellowship, art historian and theorist Sven Lütticken leads the seminar The (Legal) Person and the Legal Form: Theoretical, Artistic, and Activist Commitments to foster dialogue and deepen the hypotheses and questions driving his research project.
This project, titled Unacting Personhood, Deforming Legal Abstraction, explores the dominance of real abstractions—such as exchange value and legal form—over our processes of subjectivation, and asks how artistic practices can open up alternative ways of representing or performing the subject and their legal condition in the contemporary world.
The seminar consists of eight two-hour sessions, divided into three chapters throughout the academic year. While conceived as non-public spaces for discussion and collective work, these sessions complement, nourish, and amplify the public program of the Studies Constellation.
This first chapter of the seminar, composed of three sessions, serves as an introduction to the fundamental issues of the research concerning theoretical, artistic, and activist engagements with the legal form. It includes three sessions dedicated respectively to: the legal form, through the work of French jurist, philosopher, and lawyer Bernard Edelman, with particular attention to his Marxist theory of photography (translated into German by Harun Farocki); the (legal) person, via contributions from Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito, academic, social justice activist, and writer Radha D’Souza, and visual artist Jonas Staal; and land, through the work of researcher Brenna Bhandar—specialist in the colonial foundations of modern law and the notion of property—and artist, filmmaker, and researcher Marwa Arsanios.
Through these and other readings, case study analyses, and collective discussions, the seminar aims to open a space for critical reflection on the ways in which the law—both juridical form and legal form—is performed and exceeded by artistic and activist practices, as well as by theoretical and political approaches that challenge its foundations and contemporary projections.