-
5 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Colloquium. Amos Gitai, in conversation with Jean-François Chevrier
This event serves as an introduction to both the film series and the exhibition dedicated to the filmmaker. With a notion of documentary as a poetic tale of resistance, the work of Amos Gitai has profound links with the narration of place using life experience, an aspect that lends structure to the exhibitions Biographical Forms and The Biographies of Amos Gitai, both curated by Jean-François Chevrier.
-
6 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 1. Architecture and House
House
1980, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 51’Architecture
1978, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 13’15House, or Baït according to the common transcription of the Arabic and Hebrew words, is the story of a house in West Jerusalem. The home belonged to a Palestinian family until the war in 1948 that, with the founding of the state of Israel, forced its owners into exile. At the time of the filming, the house is in the process of being enlarged. The film features the voices of the successive owners and renters (from 1956 onwards) and also that of the previous owner, Mahmud Dajani, a Palestinian doctor who must live with the errors of the radicalism of his defeated compatriots. Some neighbours recount their memories. A Palestinian worker denounces his working conditions and Israeli domination of the occupied territories.
Two years earlier Gitai had directed what he himself called his last film on architecture, Architecture, which was shot in Haifa. The International Style, which his father the architect Munio Weinraub Gitai (1907-1970) followed, is denounced by means of a comparison with vernacular forms of construction.
-
11 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 2. Field Diary
Field Diary
1982, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 83’This film examines the legitimisation of the violence used against the Palestinians: It is the story of the occupier’s inability to face up to his own actions, taking refuge in abstractions (God, the Nation, Security) and turning that into a mechanism for legitimising what he does , in the words of Gitai. The filming began three months before the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The film describes the escalation of violence and how it becomes installed in people’s mentalities. The takes are long and the film is made up of sequences that are dramatic units in themselves. Various sequences are devoted to a visit with the mayor of Nablus, who is under home arrest. The dramatic argument resides in the confrontation between the witness-filmmaker (the small crew behind the camera) and the police forces (the army) and the revelation of the effects that nationalist propaganda has on young Israeli soldiers.
-
12 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 3. Pineapple
Pineapple
1983, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 78’This film is an inquiry into the methods of rationalisation and exploitation used by multinationals in today's global economy. The example studied is a pineapple-producing company with headquarters in Honolulu , a distribution subsidiary in San Francisco , and croplands in Hawaii , although cultivation is in the process of being outsourced to the Philippines . The voices are those of the people involved in this system: upper and middle level management, foremen and workers, in the fields and in the packaging facilities. Part of the “packaging” is also the Christian moral propaganda that allows order to be maintained without physical violence.
-
13 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 4. Bangkok-Bahrain. Labour for sale
Bangkok-Bahrain. Labour for sale
1984, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 78’
Shot one year after Pineapple, this documentary is an uncomfortable look at the extreme forms of modern slavery existing in Thailand: prostitution and the trade in labourers hired for jobs in the Persian Gulf. The film gives a voice to the people who benefit from this exploitation. It also attempts to overcome the silence imposed on both prostitutes and emigrant workers. Enslaved bodies are given words under coercion. The film points out the obstacles to these people telling their story, a minimum condition of identity and a means towards emancipation.
-
17 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 5. Esther
Esther
1985, 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 97' Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisEsther is Gitai’s first fiction film. Conceived as an immense tableau vivant , it tells the Old Testament story of Esther. The film was shot in the ruins of Haifa ’s old Arab quarter, Wadi Salib, where Palestinians lived until 1948. The neighbourhood was destroyed in 1959 as a result of a rebellion by the newly-arrived Sephardic population against the power monopoly held by the Ashkenazi community. This historical stratification becomes the setting for the biblical tale, which tells of the struggle by the Hebrew people to survive in the Persian Empire . In the end violence is exercised also by those who have been oppressed. But the film concludes with a return to the present: each of the main actors tells his or her own story.
-
18 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 6. A House in Jerusalem
A House in Jerusalem
1998, blu-ray, original version with Spanish subtitles, 85’Eighteen years after his first feature film, Gitai returned to the locations of House and resumed his investigation: the time of a generation has passed, Mahmud Dajani is now dead, his son has adopted Canadian nationality and his granddaughter says she is moving to Canada. The film’s territory has become larger, it is now about several houses instead of just one. An Englishman and a Swedish woman have moved into the neighbourhood. Palestinian workers , Gitai comments, discover Jewish archaeological sites that will later be used to justify the expulsion of the Palestinians.
-
19 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 7. Kippur
Kippur
2000, 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 120' Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisOn October 11th, 1973, during the Yom Kippur war, the helicopter Gitai was aboard was shot down by a missile. The film reconstructs the episode and the circumstances surrounding it, beginning with the declaration of war. Kippur is one of the best examples of the war film genre in recent filmmaking. The war is shown to be a present time inscribed in people’s gestures, a present that takes over bodies and impregnates biographies. The images have a great physical presence; the sound is imposing, horrific. I tried to create an ongoing bombardment of sound. I wanted people to feel that the episode is beyond the camera’s control, that it exceeds our field of vision , states Gitai.
-
24 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 8. News from Home/News from House
News from Home/News from House
2005. 35mm, original version with Spanish subtitles, 97’ Courtesy of the Institut FrançaisAt the beginning of this film, a sign says: This film, House , has been filmed three times over the past twenty-five years. This tends to make one think that the three films devoted to this house in Jerusalem are but one. Gitai suggests as well that the cinematographic story absorbs the time period. The film is shown to be akin to a construction taking place over time and history. In the words of the filmmaker: In a way, documentaries are something like a human archaeological site, I think this is the function of documentaries in general: to excavate, to make the plan as a whole appear, to reveal the structure masked by the present (…). Layer by layer we see the characters arriving: workers, owners, people bringing little things, fragments of memories, events, photographs.
-
26 February, 2014 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 9. Carmel
Carmel <
2009, hard drive, original version with Spanish subtitles, 93’Carmel is one of the two films that Gitai has dedicated recently to his parents. The main character is Efratia Margalit Gitai. She passed away in 2004, having been born in 1909 in Palestine, (Haifa) to parents recently emigrated from central Europe. She married the architect Munio Weinraub Gitai in 1936. The film, conceived as a poetic montage of documents and acted sequences, reconstructs the key moments in Efratia’s life, but also in the life of Amos, as a child and then as an adult, in relation with his own children. The documentary material comprises essentially family photos and letters read by actors, with the addition of a fragment of film-memory shot in super 8. The archaeological form of House is found here as an elegy. Carmel is the name of the mountain looming over Haifa.

Held on 05, 06, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 24, 26 Feb 2014
This series spans more than thirty years of activity by Amos Gitai, beginning with Architecture, a short film from 1978. This film, made when the filmmaker still planned to pursue a career in architecture, already contained signs of the critical dimension that would be confirmed in his later documentaries. Gitai became a filmmaker when he made House in 1980. With its return visits and continuations in 1998 (A House in Jerusalem) and 2005 (News from Home/News from House), this film can be likened to a coming-of-age novel of an architect-filmmaker. It tells the story of a dispossession, from the vantage point of the house’s former owner, a Palestinian forced to leave in 1948. The current circumstances of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are seen in the builders’ living and working conditions in 1980.
For Gitai, the present is inscribed in a time period and also in a historical stratum. The blending of these two approaches, which constitutes the principal strength of his documentary films, is also seen in his fiction works, such as Esther (1985), Kippur (2000) and Carmel (2009). Long sequence shots, which express a kind of continuity, are inserted into a montage of fragmentary and at times dissonant shots. The story, with its biographical or autobiographical content, encompasses and overcomes the documentary/fiction distinction upon which cinematic discourse still rests and which Gitai takes apart.
House illustrates that the dramatic processes of documentary film are analogous to the constructive methods of an architect. The construction of the film responds to the transformation of the house. The quarry from which the Palestinian workers extract the stone is an allegorical place. The power relations characteristic of the world of labour are related to a situation of political domination, based on the appropriation of territory.
Produced in Israel by a television network, the film has never been distributed in that country. But Field Diary, shot in March of 1982, just before the war with Lebanon, did lead to a climate of hate, as Gitai described it, that prompted him to take exile in France. Pineapple and Bangkok-Bahrain were made from this position of distance. The two films use investigative reporting practices and constitute a diptych on the networks of exploitation and servitude at the international level.
The central question explored by Gitai’s work, and found throughout the nine features and the short film that make up this series, is the construction/violence relation, particularly vivid for an architect-filmmaker in a country in which territorial conflicts are always accompanied by acts of construction and destruction. Constructions appear as the response to or the prolongation of violence. Like violence, construction is material, physical yet it also has a symbolic dimension. That is why his films are an ensemble of elements that take on meaning in the course of a story, inside a film or from one film to another. Gitai is an architect-filmmaker, but he is also a biographer-filmmaker. His life is one of the biographies that make up an open-ended opus, an opus under construction.
Más actividades

Dominga Sotomayor. Debajo and Thais Fujinaga. A Felicidade das Coisas
Friday 14 August 2026
Two gems, from two new voices in Latin American cinema, which swing between families, swimming pools, reencounters and status. In Debajo, a short film on youth by Chilean director Dominga Sotomayor, an abstract yet powerful bird’s-eye view of a swimming pool co-exists with the relationships of a crisis-stricken family, gathered to see an eclipse. Sotomayor’s distinctive film-making of care and affects shares a similar space to the daily naturalism of Thais Fujinaga’s A Felicidade das Coisas. In the director’s first feature film, the swimming pool is not a horizontal basin for swimmers’ immersion; rather it is a huge vertical monolith, a kind of an anti-monument, anchored in the garden of a middle-class family. The film conveys the efforts and challenges of a mother of two children to build a swimming pool in their modest summer house, a mother who, alone, comes up against a hypermasculine world. Equally, the film speaks of family love, and the search for status, with the swimming pool a languishing totem of the Brazilian middle class during the years of Bolsonarism.
![Blake Edwards, The Party [El guateque], 1968, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-14.jpg.webp)
Blake Edwards. The Party
Saturday, 15 August 2026
In The Party, actor Hrundi V. Bakshi (Peter Sellers) is mistakenly invited to a glamorous dinner party in Hollywood. His curiosity and two left feet lead to one funny mishap after the other. During the soiree he consoles Michèle, a young actress who has been fired by her producer, and the chaos gathers momentum when Bakshi accidentally opens a retractable floor, making the guests fall into a swimming pool. A small hippie-style elephant gatecrashes the party, brought by a group of young people, and Bakshi asks the guests to wash the elephant as it is a sacred animal in his country. The house fills with soap suds, culminating in a wackily chaotic party.
When Stanley Kubrick was once asked who Peter Sellers was, he replied: “There is no such person as Peter Sellers”. The Party is one of the most widely recognised comedies in the history of film, its director Blake Edwards and the English actor making an entertaining critique of a fading conservative society. The cultural revolutions of the 1960s fit into the container of a choppy swimming pool: people from high society, an elephant, a Russian ballet, waiters, beatnik youth… similar to Sellers’s own identity: an empty vessel that can be refilled. In the film, Edwards tapped into the ingenious actor’s innate improvisation and the swimming pool as a container for revolutionary intent.

Lucrecia Martel. La ciénaga (The Swamp)
Viernes 21 de agosto, 2026
A couple of families spend the summer in a country cottage. The relationship between them exposes a crisis. The alcoholism of Mecha (Graciela Borges) and Gregorio (Martín Adjemián) becomes clear, leading to a drift in the education of their children and impacting relationships of respect and affect. Weariness expresses the lackadaisical environment.
In La ciénaga Lucrecia Martel approaches the decadence of a middle-class Argentinian family. The pool of dirty, stagnant water reflects the economic and social collapse of a whole country, yet reflects more than economic crisis as it becomes a murky well feeding off the pain of those living in the house. An erstwhile space of joy, the swimming pool becomes a reflection of adult depression, resulting in apathy. And the children, especially the girls, seem to be the only people awake in this drift. Barring a flicker of unawareness, the young people immerse themselves in rainwater or the water from the river, in water that flows, but are cautious of getting too close to the swimming pool.
![Yorgos Lanthimos, Kynodontas [Canino], 2009, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-16_00.jpg.webp)
Yorgos Lanthimos. Dogtooth
Saturday, 22 August 2026
A couple with three adult children live in a modern country cottage. A large swimming pool takes centre stage in a sizeable garden. The property is skirted by a large fence that blocks a view of the outside. Here, the father has educated his children without outside contact, maintaining their belief in a false world: aeroplanes fall in the garden like toys and they must act like dogs to defend themselves from the ferocious cats that surround the house. The promise of going out into the world when they lose their dogtooth is proof of their maturity.
Lanthimos builds a world that is surreal, comical and terrible. The swimming pool is the house’s central element, a limited, controlled space assimilated like the sea, yet under the father’s supervision. A space of imagination, but with sinister intentions: the children are indoctrinated under the water as they believe in a better world. Far from reality. The swimming pool’s limits are the limits of their freedom, a false state of well-being expressed in the weightless bodies in the water. The liquid element is an analgesic magma with the power to educate offspring under the latent fear of a shark bite.
![Binka Zhelyazkova, Baseynat [La piscina], 1977, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-17_00.png.webp)
Binka Zhelyazkova. The Swimming Pool
Viernes 28 de agosto, 2026
The young, bright Bella (Yanina Kasheva), after unforeseen heartbreak at her graduation party, meets Apostol (Kosta Tsonev), a reserved architect, and Boyan (Kliment Denchev), a comedy actor who is cynical about his country. The three characters climb up to a diving board in a municipal swimming pool, where they begin a strange relationship of friendship, love and despair which reflects a generational clash.
Binka Zhelyazkova, the great enfant terrible of Eastern European cinema, critic of the communist system and widely acclaimed film-maker beyond Bulgarian borders, made in The Swimming Pool a masterly metaphor for a country in decline. The public pool symbolises a closed, immovable enclosure where society is festering. From the height of a diving board she sees, in a panoptic view, the different generations living underneath a limited space. On one side, older people attempt to preserve the old revolutionary spirit with constant collective swimming exercises while, on the other, young people don’t hide the desire for freedom that remains unrealised. The result is an ideological clash in how to act and move in the enclosure, unearthing vast hypocrisy in the lost ideals of socialism, reflected in the total apathy of youth. The Swimming Pool for Zhelyazkova is a reflection of the disillusionment and existential void of a whole country and system.



