-
February 20, 2013 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Faculty of Fine Arts
Table 1. Art Practices, Research and the University: R&D+innovation as a New Model of Knowledge
Location: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Faculty of Fine Arts
Coordinated by: Selina Blasco and Aurora Fernández Polanco
Participants: Fernando Baños, Carlos Fernández Pello, Beatriz Fernández Ruiz, Ricardo Horcajada, Lila Insúa, Josu Larrañaga, Juan Luis Moraza, Emilio Moreno, Jaime Munárriz, Victoria Pérez Royo, José Antonio Sánchez and Remedios ZafraSchedule:
10 a.m.- 2 p.m. Seminar for the members of the three groups comprising the platform “The education of the artist: research and academic capitalism.” Not open to the general public.
4 - 8 p.m. Round table
Open to the public -
June, 2013 Museo de la Universidad de Navarra
Table 2. Art Education in Modernity: From The Academy to the Pedagogical Models of the Avant-Gardes
Location: Museo de la Universidad de Navarra
Coordinated by: Carlos Chocarro and Jorge Fernández -
November 11, 2013 Museo Reina Sofía. Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Table 3. The Knowledge of Images: The Debate about Images and about Art as Knowledge
This table looks at the recent theoretical debate arising around the subject of the image, with special emphasis on the trends that defend an anthropological conception of the image – as an object and an act.
The table will review the disciplinary polemics of recent decades, basically those revolving around a new history of images, visual studies and iconic shift. At the same time, in a public colloquium, it intends to analyse the relationships between image and knowledge, between visual and textual discourse, and also the links that connect art to technique and scientific thought.
Coordinated by: José Díaz Cuyás and Esther Terrón
Program
10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. In-house seminar. Nouvel Building, Study Centre
Open only to the team and the members of the three groups that take part in this research platform.
4:00 p.m.- 8:00 p.m. Public round table. Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Moderated by : José D íaz Cuyás and Esther Terrón Participants: the guests - at the table - and members of the team from the audience.
Participants: Ana García Varas, Yaiza Hernández, Irene Kopelman, José Luis Pardo and Pedro G. Romero
The Education of the Artist: Research and Academic Capitalism

Held on 11 Nov 2013
In recent years, the education of the artist has become one of the most intractable problems being debated in the art world. Despite the seemingly permanent tension that has existed between educational institutions and the art scene throughout modern times, never before has it been so difficult to reach a consensus in the academic sphere about which theoretical and technical concepts an artist in training must develop. The difference lies in that nowadays it is no longer simply a matter of discussing educational programs; rather, the polemic exists at the heart of a situation whose traditionally unvarying elements are now in a situation of crisis and transformation. This is the case of the university as an institution, the state of academic disciplines, and artistic practice itself.
In this context, the current controversy regarding research and doctoral programs in the field of fine arts derives from a curricular problem that, in reality, has been affecting art studies since they were first incorporated into university curricula. It is significant that this situation, which has been latent for years, is now being presented as a new and urgent debate, just when RD+innovation has become the goal and the model of universal knowledge. Now, under the Bologna Plan, all academic areas or disciplines, including art, must engage in research guided by concepts of a certain technocratic semblance, as open to ideological interpretation, as the concepts of innovation and development.
Addressed as a cultural symptom, the dilemma of the artist as researcher finds itself at a crossroads: initially, it appears to be an academic and curricular issue, but due to its implications and repercussions, it calls for a re-examination of ideological and epistemological questions regarding the distinctive nature of art in today's world. Preliminary work in this area suggests that the complicated task of integrating art education into the new paradigm of R&D+innovation offers a critical perspective, an excellent vantage point for studying the contradictions not only within the emergent production of academic knowledge, but also within new artistic production.
Participants
Coordinators
Selina Blasco, Art History professor in the School of Fine Arts and Vice-Dean of University Outreach Programmes at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Carlos Chocarro, profesor in the Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura at the Universidad de Navarra.
José Díaz Cuyás, profesor of aesthetics at the Universidad de la Laguna.
Jorge Fernández Santos, researcher for the subprogramme Ramón y Cajal (Ministerio de Ciencia e Investigación, Madrid) appointed to the Universitat Jaume I de Castellón.
Aurora Fernández Polanco, tenured professor in the Department of Contemporary Art and Director of the Art History Department in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Esther Terrón, philosophy professor in Tenerife and docent in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad de La Laguna.
Participants (Table 1)
Fernando Baños, artist, researcher at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, and member of the R&D project Imágenes del arte y reescritura de las imágenes en la cultura visual global.
Carlos Fernández Pello, researcher and cultural producer, member of the collective Rampa.
Beatriz Fernández Ruiz, Art History professor in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Ricardo Horcajada, Director of the MIAC Master Program in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Lila Insua, professor of project guidance courses in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Josu Larrañaga, Dean of the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Juan Luis Moraza, sculptor, tenured professor in the Sculpture Department of the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad de Vigo, and founding member of the collective CVA.
Emilio Moreno, Amsterdam-based artist and professor in Gerrit Rietveld Academy. He has recently exhibited his work in South African National Gallery (Cape Town), Casco (Utrecht), and Van Abbemuseum/ Onomatopee (Eindhoven).
Jaime Munárriz, Vice-Dean of Research and Post-Graduate Studies at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Victoria Pérez Royo, researcher for Artea, professor of aesthetics and art theory in the School of Philosophy at the Universidad de Zaragoza and co-Director of the Masters Program in Performing Arts Practices and Visual Culture.
José Antonio Sánchez, honorary professor in the Faculty of Fine Arts in Cuenca, co-Director of the Masters Program in Performing Practices and Visual Culture, and researcher for Artea.
Remedios Zafra, writer and tenured professor of art, innovation and digital culture at the Universidad de Sevilla and of politics of the gaze at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Director of the platform X0y1 for research and art practice on identity and network culture.
Más actividades
![Céline Sciamma, Naissance des pieuvres [Lirios de agua], 2007, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-3.jpg.webp)
Céline Sciamma. Water Lilies
Friday, 10 July 2026
Céline Sciamma’s directorial debut, Naissance des pieuvres,depicts the emotional and sexual awakening of three teenagers around an indoor swimming pool in a Parisian suburb. Marie, a fifteen-year-old introvert, becomes fascinated by Floriane, the charismatic captain of a local synchronised swimming team. Driven by this attraction, Marie tries to get closer to her while observing the complex dynamics of desire, friendship and power that develops between the young girls. At the same time, Anne, one of Marie’s friends, has her own experience of insecurity and affective search, shaped by the pressure to fit in and belong. As the relationship between the three intensifies, contradictions surface between the image they outwardly project and their real feelings.
Standing away from the common places on adolescence, Céline Sciamma explores first love, burgeoning queer identity and the uncertainty of desire with an intimate, observational gaze, resulting in a sensitive and honest portrait of a time of transformation, in which each gesture leads to the passage from childhood to adulthood.

Sofia Coppola. Somewhere
Saturday, 11 July 2026
Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff), a famous Hollywood actor, lives a life of pleasure in Hotel Chateau Marmont in Los Angeles, drifting aimlessly between vacuous relationships, punctuated by film shoots and commercial duties. Cleo (Elle Fanning), his eleven-year-old daughter, stays with him for a few weeks due to her mother’s absence, forcing him to rethink his life.
Sofia Coppola’s employment of swimming pools is carefully considered in the film — blue water in Somewhere is the only place where Marco can recover the meaning of his existence as the pool acts as a womb in which he finds balance. While living with his daughter Cleo and the reflection of these aquatic moments — diving under water, floating, playing or simply sunbathing with no real purpose — everything happens. Thus, Coppola explores in depth themes such as fame, loneliness and the complexity of human ties, putting forward an intimate and profound portrait full of the subtleties of life.

Jonathan Glazer. Sexy Beast
Friday, 17 July 2026
Gal Dove (Ray Winstone), a criminal for the British mafia, lives happily retired with his wife in an idyllic villa in southern Spain and a dazzling swimming pool. Their peace is shattered with the arrival of Don Logan (Ben Kingsley), a former gangster and criminal associate who wants to convince him to do one last job.
If a swimming pool can be at the heart of suspense, then Sexy Beast is the quintessence. The reflection of blue water in Gal’s idyllic seclusion symbolises the artificial paradise that can be broken at any time. This first feature-length film by British director Jonathan Glazer (also the director of The Zone of Interest, 2023) starts with one of the most striking swimming pool scenes, a symbol for the impending danger about to reach this whitewashed haven of peace. The perfect vision of recreated beauty — luxury pools on the Andalusian coast — which, in the depths of pristine water, conceals an unsettling fear of returning to the past.
![François Ozon, Swimming Pool [La piscina], 2003, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-6.jpg.webp)
François Ozon. Swimming Pool
Saturday, 18 July 2026
Sarah Morton (Charlotte Rampling), a frustrated English writer paralysed by writer’s block, is invited by her editor to spend a few days in her summer house in the south of France. While there she meets Julie (Ludivine Sagnier), the editor’s uninhibited daughter. The young girl’s hypersexuality clashes with Morton’s cold nature, an initial hostility which turns into a fascination with the private life of the young girl, serving the writer as inspiration for her new novel and tugging the story to an ambiguous game between truth and imagination.
Being in crisis is wanting to be another person. Sarah wants to absorb the vitality of her young host, a process of metamorphosis triggered by the swimming pool. The pool is the film’s central character, the place where Julie shows her naked body and amorous acts, sending Sarah into a state of agitation. Through the pool and its water, the writer drinks in Julie’s wild passion. The aquatic enclosure thus acts as catharsis: the place where the subconscious of the writer flourishes, enabling her to unleash her creativity and free her fantasies. At the same time, water distorts the image, blurring fiction and reality; ultimately, the necessary medium to keep art afloat.
![Jean Vigo, Taris, ou la natation [Taris, rey del agua], 1931, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-7.jpg.webp)
Leni Riefenstahl. Olympia, Part 2. Festival of Beauty and Jean Vigo. Taris, Swimming Champion
Friday, 24 July 2026
The body in water as an object of ideology. This is one of the major themes of the 1930s and this session, where Nazism and Anarchism dissolve into two different swimming pools. Two great films of counterposed ideologies which have gone down in history as examples of film’s power to represent a vision of the world. In Olympia, Part 2. Festival of Beauty, Leni Riefenstahl films the Olympic Games of Berlin in 1936, organised during the Third Reich. The camera leaves the athletics stadium to show the repertoire of modern sports — fencing, polo, cycling, pentathlon — before culminating in the Olympic pool with Adolf Hitler as the host, where the beautiful, disciplined, classical bodies of the swimmers bring to mind, as Susan Sontag wrote, the visual fascination that characterised fascism. Meanwhile, Jean Vigo, the son of an exiled Spanish anarchist, films French Olympic champion Jean Taris in a funny, playful exercise, where the swimming pool becomes a field of play without rules and where avant-garde film-making elements of the 1930s materialise, such as slow motion, superimposed images and dynamic editing. Two avant-garde films, two films on opposite poles that show, for a time, swimming not as an object of pleasure or desire, but as a space of contest from which to demonstrate the power of the twentieth century’s great ideologies.