Program
-
Monday, 26 March - 7:00 pm / Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture
-
Tuesday, 27 March - 12:00 pm / Nouvel Building, Study Centre
Research workshop
Digital Capitalism and Discontent

Held on 26, 27 Mar 2018
The meteoric rise of digital giants worldwide has posed a raft of unsettling questions on the concentration of political, economic and social power in the hands of tech brokers. After relatively innocuous beginnings in the fields of advertising and online shopping, technology companies have expanded the range of their operations to offer an ever-growing array of services, many maintained by powerful artificial intelligence tools that feed off our data, hailing from areas as divergent as cybersecurity and health care.
Many observers put this meteoric rise down to the founders’ business and technological genius. Yet in the face of this individualist mythology comes the pressing need for us to make a critical reading of a situation whose hegemony can be explained through the vacuums and breaches left by obliging approaches to technology built in a new period ushered in after the Cold War. Only by comprehending the historical-political context in which this new technological capacity emerged can we be in a position to elucidate the urgent question of how to restrict and tame this new form of social and political power. If it’s still possible, that is.
This session will analyse and discuss the possible alternatives to this invisible and all-powerful government of the algorithm and Big Data, ranging from the design of new data ownership models to algorithms being subjected to audits, via the creation of cooperate platforms or the comprehensive nationalisation of technology platforms.
Workbook, with the following texts
«Socializad los centros de datos», New Left Review; 91, 2015
«Introducción», Capitalismo Big Tech. ¿Welfare o neofeudalismo digital?, Madrid, Enclave de libros, 2018
«Internet como ideología», Capitalismo Big Tech. ¿Welfare o neofeudalismo digital?, Madrid, Enclave de libros, 2018
«Digital Intermediation of Everything: at the Intersection of Politics, Technology and Finance», Empowering Democracy through Culture – Digital Tools for Culturally Competent Citizens, 4th Council of Europe Platform Exchange on Culture and Digitisation, Center for Art and Media, Karslruhe, 2017
«El activismo digital en la política de la post Guerra Fría», La era de la perplejidad: Repensar el mundo que conocíamos, Madrid, BBVA, OpenMind, Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, 2017
Activity included in the programme
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Evgeny Morozov is one of the sharpest critics of the social and political models that stem from the effects of Big Data. He is the author of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (PublicAffairs, 2011), To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Affairs (PublicAffairs, 2011), and Capitalismo Big-Tech, ¿welfare o neofeudalismo? (Enclave de Libros, 2018). He also writes a monthly column on technology and politics in The Observer (UK) and his contributions regularly appear in European and US publications, from The New Yorker and The New York Times to The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. The former editor-in-chief of The New Republic (USA), he has taught at Georgetown University and Stanford University, at the Open Society and New America Foundations and at the American Academy in Berlin.
Lecture
Research workshop

Friday 29 May and 5 June, 2026
In these films, Marilú Mallet travels to Solentiname, in Nicaragua, and Andahuaylillas, in Peru, to paint a portrait of communities which resist the severity of forced industrialisation. In Solentiname, the focus is on the poet and priest Ernesto Cardenal’s founding of a Christian, poetic and revolutionary utopia, while in Andahuaylillas, a town close to Cuzco, Mallet explores the multiple layers of Andean culture.

Thursday 28 May and 4 June, 2026
In the tension between documentary and fiction, between the rawness of a tragic political present and narrative escape, lies the truth of the exile’s condition. In Journal inachevé (Unfinished Diary, 1982) Marilú Mallet experiments with her own subjectivity, moving from affirmation to doubt. In Double Portrait (2000), María Luisa Señoret paints her daughter Marilú, who records the process. In this circular relationship, the film-maker constructs a poetics of the portrait as something perpetually unfinished, a process of exploration in which memory, identity and political history merge to become blurred.

28 MAY 2026
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
This fourth and final session centres on films that take the museum away from its axis and make it gaze from the edges. Pieces that work with that which is normally left out: peripheral territories, unpolished aesthetics, clumsy gestures full of intent. Instead of possessing an institutional lustre, here they are rough, precarious and strange in appearance, legitimate forms of making and showing culture. The idea is to think about what happens when central authority is displaced, when the ugly and the uncomfortable are not hidden, when they are recognised as part of the commons. Film that does not seek to be to one’s liking, but to open space and allow other ways of seeing and inhabiting the museum to enter stage.

Tuesday, 26, and Wednesday, 27 May 2026 – Check programme
Ordinary, Common and Public. Common Fixes for Ordinary Communities is the title of the fourteenth encounter run by Sociología Ordinaria, a transdisciplinary research group that explores daily knowledge deemed ordinary, superficial or frivolous from a traditional academic and intellectual viewpoint.
This latest edition seeks to approach and map connections between concepts of the commons and the public realm — remembering that the ordinary is also the commons — and to ensure affects and moods of discontent are mobilised towards hope.
By way of its multiple declinations — community, community-based practices, the commons, the communal — the encounter seeks to reflect on different ways of creating, (re)configuring, maintaining, fixing, arranging, caring for and defending the public realm and the commons. Furthermore, it explores forms of invocation and experimentation as tools opposite the helplessness of an uncertain present, in addition to resistance against attempts of expropriation, distortion, privatisation and touristification.

26 MAY 2026
Nancy Spector and Alejandro Cesarco, curators of the exhibition Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Sweet Revenge, will speak with Manuel Segade, director of the Museo Reina Sofía, in a session dedicated to exploring the interpretive frameworks of this first large-scalepresentation in Madrid of the work of Felix Gonzalez-Torres (1957–1996), whose practice continues to resonate in the present.
The conversation begins with the exhibition’s title itself, Sweet Revenge, understood as a paradoxical notion that articulates much of the artist’s thinking. From there, the tensions running through his work are explored: the coexistence of opposing registers, ambiguity as a method, and the simultaneously affective and political charge of his works.
The dialogue also touches on some of the themes that run through his body of work, such as thenotions of identity, citizenship, and authority, alongside experiences linked to the AIDS crisis, and emotions such as love, loss, grief, and optimism. Special attention is given to the way in which Gonzalez-Torres shifts languages associated with Arte Povera, conceptualism, and minimalism towards open, participatory, and deeply personal structures.
The session also includes a reflection on the research process that shaped the exhibition, providing context for the curatorial decisions and criteria that structure it. In this context, Gonzalez-Torres’s work emerges as a device that actively engages those who activate orinterpret it, distributing responsibility for the production of meaning—a process that is alwaysunstable and constantly under negotiation.
These inaugural conversations, part of the main working strands of the Museo’s Public Programmes Area, aim to explore in greater depth the exhibition narratives of the shows organised by the Museo from the perspective of artists, curators and specialists.