-
February 26, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 1
Luis Ospina and Carlos Mayolo. Agarrando pueblo 1977, 16 mm, colour, b/w. 27’
Luis Ospina. Ojo y vista: peligra la vida del artista. 1987, U-matic, colour. 26’
With Luis Ospina in person
In the sense of “fooling”, yet also “prefabricating”, Agarrando pueblo shows the shooting of a fictitious film entitled ¿El futuro para quién? (Whose Future?), intended for broadcast on European television sets. The directors recreate images of underdevelopment in the hurried dictation “what more misery is there?”, a phrase uttered by one of them. Agarrando pueblo shook-up film-making methods: it exposed an orthodox documentary system that freely exploited social scourges – the so-called “cine del sobreprecio (surcharge cinema)” – and renounced the way certain films considered vérité filtered and manipulated reality. Likewise, it set in motion humour and satire as critical and involved tools of film practice. Ten years after winning awards at festivals in Oberhausen and Lille, they made the epilogue Ojo y vista: peligra la vida del artista, a film in which Ospina maximised the new medium of video to reassemble and revisit a scene from Agarrando pueblo: a well-known street performer who, in his proclamations on abandonment and resistance, appears to mirror any other Colombian artist.
-
27 February, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 2
Luis Ospina and Carlos Mayolo. Oiga vea. 1972, 16 mm, b/w. 27’
Luis Ospina and Carlos Mayolo. Cali: de película. 1973, 35 mm, colour. 14’
With Luis Ospina in person
Coalesced around the magazine Ojo al cine and the local cinema club, the city of Cali would experience an intense film movement during the 1970s, with the late writer Andrés Caicedo and film-makers Luis Ospina and Carlos Mayolo, among others, at the core. Both films are the outcome of what was known as Caliwood. Oiga vea documents exclusion in the VI Pan-American Games and is edited with contrasts as the presentations and official anthems give way to shanty towns and slums facing monuments and empty stadiums, police and military occupation and the geopolitical tension between Cuba and the USA within an event that takes the city hostage. In Cali: de película, Ospina and Mayolo go to great lengths to transfer the urban landscape of Jean Vigo in A Propos de Nice (1930) to the Cauca Valley city. Festivities, carnival and daily humour in the face of either violence or the theatricality of public life show, in Ospina’s words, that everything is a disguise and forms part of the same ritual.
-
2 March, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 3
Luis Ospina. Pura sangre. 1982, 35 mm, colour. 98’
One of the best examples of the so-called “tropical gothic”, a sub-genre comprising the translation and deviation of conventions and narrative frameworks in order to consider a real theme from fiction and parody. Pura sangre mixes together two myths: the vampire of Western culture and the “monster of the valley”, a serial child killer and rapist in 1970s Colombia. In the film an ailing and bedridden tycoon survives through mass blood transfusions taken from young men, kidnapped by his employees. The story is used to present a case of age-old exploitation and corruption, where high society “bleeds dry” peasants paralysed by fear, with the help of a corrupt middle class.
-
3 March, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Session 4
Luis Ospina. Un tigre de papel. 2007, Betacam Digital. 114’
Concerned throughout his work with the preservation of film archives, the conditions for artistic practices in Colombia and the particular narration from Latin America, Un tigre de papel seems to synthesise the combination of the film-maker’s interests, translated into his irreverent artistic code of play and humour, where there is no greater truth than the one discovered by a lie. Un tigre de papel recounts the life of a pioneer of collage in Colombia, Pedro Manrique Figueroa, an activist and militant artist, the alter-ego of so many Latin American artists participating in the networks of visual poetry and mail art, who, before his disappearance, unsuccessfully tried to donate himself to the Museo de Arte Moderno in Bogotá. This fictitious life allowed Ospina to trace a wide panorama of art and public life in Colombia with the participation of many of its protagonists.
Luis Ospina, Triple Agent

Held on 26, 27 Feb, 02, 03 Mar 2015
Together with Carlos Mayolo, Luis Ospina has directed some of the most incisive and critical films on the identity stereotypes that are still prevalent in the cultural imaginary of Colombia and, by extension, Latin America. Setting out from the term “porno-miseria”, his work explicitly speaks out against the obscene use of violence and extreme poverty as a spectacle.
This film series, with the film-maker present, serves as an introduction to his work. The triple agent, which lends its name to this programme, is a collage by the artist Pedro Manrique Figueroa, portraying, autobiographically, the ambiguous relationship between art and politics in the Latin America of this renowned, fictional artist, who is the focal point of the film Un tigre de papel (2007), Luis Ospina’s fictional documentary that concludes the series.
The triple agent is also the role the Colombian film-maker undertakes in his relationship to multiple debates, movements and schools – from the militant cinema of the 1960s and 1970s to video activism in the 1980s, from documentary realism to the poetics of underdevelopment. Despite his constant participation in all of them, he exposes their biased inclination towards stereotypes or towards representative paternalism and perpetually explores their critical tension. This retrospective shows the director’s confrontation in Agarrando pueblo (co-directed with Carlos Mayolo, 1978), in which social protest, the limits of film language and the ethics of participation are explored over four sessions that feature input from the film-maker.
Framework
ARCO Colombia 2015
In collaboration with
Government of Colombia
Curatorship
Chema González
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Más actividades

Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art
23 February – 14 December 2026 – Check programme
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art is a study group aligned towards thinking about how certain contemporary artistic and cultural practices resist the referentiality that dominates the logics of production and the consumption of present-day art. At the centre of this proposal are the concepts of difficulty and deviation, under which it brings together any procedure capable of preventing artistic forms from being absorbed by a meaning that appears previous to and independent from its expression. By ensuring the perceptibility of their languages, difficulty invites us to think of meaning as the effect of a signifying tension; that is, as a productive and creative activity which, from the materiality of art objects, frees aesthetic experience from the representational mandate and those who participate in it from the passiveness associated with tasks of mimesis and decoding.
The economy of the referential norm translates the social logic of capitalism, where insidious forms of capturing subjectivity and meaning operate. In the early 1980s, and adopting a Marxist framework, poet Ron Silliman highlighted how this logic entailed separating language from any mark, gesture, script, form or syntax that might link it to the conditions of its production, rendering it fetichised (as if without a subject) and alienating its users in a use for which they are not responsible. This double dispossession encodes the political strategy of referential objectivity: with no subject and no trace of its own consistency, language is merely an object, that reality in which it disappears.
The political uses of referentiality, more sophisticated today than ever before, sustain the neoliberal-extractivist phase of capitalism that crosses through present-day societies politically, economically and aesthetically. Against them, fugitive artistic practices emerge which, drawing from Black and Queer studies and other subaltern critical positions, reject the objective limits of what exists, invent forms to name what lies outside what has already been named, and return to subjects the capacity to participate in processes of emission and interpretation.
Read from the standpoint of artistic work, the objective capture of referentiality may be called transparency. Viewed from a social contract that reproduces inequality in fixed identity positions, transparent in this objectivity are, precisely, the discourses that maintain the status quo of domination. Opposite the inferno of these discourses, this group aims to collectively explore, through deviant or fugitive works, the paradise of language that Monique Wittig encountered in the estranged practices of literature. For the political potency of difficulty — that is, its contribution to the utopia of a free language among equals — depends on making visible, first, its own deviations; from there, the norm that those deviations transgress; and finally, the narrowness of a norm which in no way exhausts the possibilities ofsaying, signifying, referring and producing a world.
From this denouncement of referential alienation, fetishisation and capture, Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art turns its attention to the strategies of resistance deployed by contemporary artists and poets. Its interest is directed towards proposals as evidently difficult or evasive as those of Gertrude Stein, Lyn Hejinian, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Kameelah Janan Rasheed, Kathy Acker, María Salgado and Ricardo Carreira, and as seemingly simple as those of Fernanda Laguna, Felix Gonzalez Torres and Cecilia Vicuña, among other examples that can be added according to the desires and dynamics of the group.
The ten study group sessions, held between February and December, combine theoretical seminars, work with artworks from the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections and exhibitions, reading workshops and public programs. All these formats serve as spaces of encounter to think commonly about certain problems of poetics — that is, certain political questions — of contemporary writing and art.
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art inaugurates the research line Goodbye, Representation, through which the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Directorship seeks to explore the emergence of contemporary artistic and cultural practices which move away from representation as a dominant aesthetic-political strategy and redirect their attention toward artistic languages that question the tendency to point, name and fix, advocating instead for fugitive aesthetics. Over its three-year duration, this research line materializes in study groups, seminars, screenings and other forms of public programming.

CLINIC 2628. A Community of Writing and Research in the Arts
February – October 2026
Clinic 2628 is a project which supports and brings together writings which stem from the intention to offer a space and sustainable time for research work in art and culture. Framed within an academic context which is increasingly less receptive to the forms in which thinking happens and is expressed, the aim is to rescue the academic from its neoliberal trappings and thus recover the alliance between precision and intuition, work and desire. A further goal is to return writing to a commons which makes this possible through the monitoring of processes and the collectivisation of ideas, stances, references and strategies.
The endeavour, rooted in a collaboration between the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Directorship and the Artea research group, via the i+D Experimenta project, is shaped by three annual editions conceived as spaces of experimentation, discussion and a demonstration of writings critical of what is put forward by today’s academia.
What forces, forms and processes are at play when writing about art and aesthetics? In academia, in museums and in other cultural institutions, the practice of writing is traversed by productivist logics which jeopardise rhythms of research and experimentation. The imposition of both scientism inherent in the structure of “the paper” and the quantifying of results which demand a criterion of quality and visibility sterilise and smoothen, from the outset, the coarseness that is particular to writing understood from the concrete part of language: phonic, graphic, syntactic and grammatical resistance connecting the language user to the community the language unites and activates. They also sterilise the roughness enmeshed in the same desire to write, the intuitive, clear and confusing pathways that once again connect the writer to those reading and writing, participating in a common good that is at once discovered and produced.
The progressive commercialisation of knowledge propelled by cognitive capitalism moves further away from the research and production of knowledge in artworks and artistic languages and practices. The work of curators and archive, criticism, performances and essays formerly saw a horizon of formal and emotional possibilities, of imagination that was much broader when not developed in circumstances of competition, indexing and impact. Today, would it be possible to regain, critically not nostalgically, these ways; namely, recovering by forms, and by written forms, the proximity between art thinking and its objects? How to write in another way, to another rhythm, with no more demands than those with which an artwork moves towards different ways of seeing, reading and being in the world?

Cultural Work
Thursday, 12 February 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
Session number two looks to approach film as a place from which cultural work is made visible and processes of production engage in dialogue with artistic creation. From this premise, the session focuses on exploring how audiovisual content is produced, assembled and distributed, from the hands that handle the images to the bodies that participate in its circulation. The aim is to reflect on the invisible effort, precarity and forms of collaboration that uphold cultural life, that transform the filmic experience into an act that recognises and cares for common work.
![Basel Abbas y Ruanne Abou-Rahme, At Those Terrifying Frontiers Where the Existence and Disappearance of People Fade Into Each Other [En esas fronteras aterradoras donde la existencia y la desaparición de personas se disuelven entre sí], 2019](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Colecci%C3%B3n/abbasabourahme.png.webp)
Gaza and Aestheticide
Tuesday February 10, 2026 – 16:00 h
This seminar examines the systematic destruction of Palestinian collective sensibility — what we might call “aestheticide” — that has accompanied Israel’s genocide and ecocide in Gaza, and considers the conditions of artistic practice in its aftermath. Over more than two years, the demolition of universities, archives, museums, and libraries has not only erased cultural and intellectual infrastructure but has also targeted the very possibility of representation itself. The destruction of a people has been accompanied by the destruction of their image, their history, and their capacity to be known: reportage, scholarship, and cultural memory have been deliberately undermined, with media institutions, universities, and museums often complicit in this repression. Gaza consequently functions as a rehearsal space for a possible global future — of fascism, post-liberal authoritarianism, militarized borders, and AI-enabled warfare —, a laboratory for an emerging world order. What, then, becomes of critical analysis and resistance under these conditions? And what becomes of aesthetics and politics?
This three-hour seminar engages in dialogue with a broader line of work on the climate emergency and decolonial perspectives developed within the Museum of the Commons project (2023–2026) of the L’Internationale network, of which the Museo Reina Sofía is a member; as well as with some of the questions that animate the study group Aesthetics of Peace and Desertion Tactics. Finally, it is also embedded in a wider strategy of support for and commitment to the artistic and discursive practices of Palestinian artists and cultural practitioners, most clearly reflected in the TEJA network.

TEJA 2026. Open Call for Emergency Art Residencies
Proposal submission until 12 January, 2026
TEJA / Red de espacios culturales en apoyo a situaciones de emergencia [Network of Cultural Spaces in Support of Emergency Situations] has the mission to promote transnational cooperation by offering temporary art residencies to artists and cultural practitioners who find themselves in complex socio-political situations in their countries of origin. During their stay in Spain, residents receive accommodation, legal and psychological counseling, and access to a network of organizations and professionals with whom they can share, develop, and continue with their creative projects. The goal is to provide a safe and stimulating environment where artists can continue their work despite adverse circumstances and generate dialogue spaces that ensure freedom of expression through joint activities both in Spain and with international collaborators.
During 2026, TEJA hosts three new residencies, each lasting three months, dedicated to supporting artists and cultural practitioners residing in the West Bank and Jerusalem. In addition, in the second half of the year, TEJA hosts three additional residencies for Gazan artists, which are offered by invitation (as Spain is currently unable to facilitate evacuations from Gaza, these invitations are coordinated through France). These residencies aim to provide a stable, creative environment and foster artistic exchange in the face of ongoing adversities. Through this new program, TEJA reaffirms its commitment to amplifying Palestinian voices and empowering artists as they navigate these turbulent times.
The selection is carried out by the TEJA network in close collaboration with each hosting partner. This year the hosting partners are: La Escocesa (Barcelona), hablarenarte / Planta Alta (Madrid), Espositivo (Madrid), Institute for Postnatural Studies (Madrid), Casa Árabe (Córdoba). The selection prioritizes the artist’s personal and professional situation first, and then the alignment with the practices and themes of the hosting spaces. Proposal submission deadline is January 12th, 2026, 23:59 h.



![Miguel Brieva, ilustración de la novela infantil Manuela y los Cakirukos (Reservoir Books, 2022) [izquierda] y Cibeles no conduzcas, 2023 [derecha]. Cortesía del artista](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ecologias_del_deseo_utopico.jpg.webp)
![Ángel Alonso, Charbon [Carbón], 1964. Museo Reina Sofía](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/perspectivas_ecoambientales.jpg.webp)