-
November 19, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Eduardo Pérez Rasilla. Approaches to Independent Theatre in Spain
Despite the unstable and perilous road it travelled down, independent theatre transformed numerous aspects of the stage in Spain, and was preceded by the considerable impetus of university theatre in the late fifties and early sixties, coming into being when the latter started to see its possibilities cut short. From that time on, until halfway through the seventies, independent theatre would conceive aesthetically innovative and politically relevant performances to reach different audiences. Touring and exhibitions of work in non-theatre spaces, as well as explorations of the possibilities of collective creation and the exposure of ideas in other artistic languages and traditions, would become the distinguishing features of the formations that opposed the poetics and ideology of run-of-the-mill, anachronistic commercial theatre in a society that demanded sweeping changes to structures and relations.
Eduardo Pérez Rasilla. Head professor of Spanish Literature at the University Carlos III of Madrid. He previously lectured at the Royal School of Dramatic Arts (RESAD), in Madrid, and has been a member of editorial boards of magazines such as Estreno, Acotaciones, Don Galán, Revista Galega de Teatro and ADE-Teatro. He has written articles for Spanish and international magazines, and is the author of numerous chapters in books on collective works. He has also written El premio Lope de Vega. Historia y desarrollo (The Lope de Vega Award. History and Development, co-written with Julio Checa, 2006) and Antología del Teatro Breve Español (1898-1940) (An Anthology of Teatro Breve in Spain, [1898–1940]), in 1997.
-
November 20, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Round-table. Theatre as a Social Catalyst
César de Vicente Hernando, Enric Ciurans and Inmaculada López Silva.
Moderated by: Mercé SaumellDiverse researchers specialised in the theatre staging from this period will discuss its context in history, the role of political militancy in its development, and its mythologies and legacy. What remains today from independent theatre?
César de Vicente Hernando. Professor of Theory and Practice in Political Theatre from the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology at the Complutense University of Madrid. He is author of La escena constituyente. Teoría y práctica del teatro político (The Constituent Stage. The Theory and Practice of Political Theatre, 2013) and La dramaturgia política (Political Dramaturgy, in print). Moreover, he has also worked on the following publications: Peter Weiss: una estética de la resistencia (Peter Weiss: The Aesthetics of Resistance, 1996), El teatro político de Erwin Piscator (Erwin Piscator’s Political Theatre, 2001), Teatro de Alfonso Sastre (Alfonso Sastre’s Theatre, 2010) and Teatro, Política, Sociedad (Theatre, Politics, Society) by Erwin Piscator (2013).
Enric Ciurans. Professor of Performing Arts History at the University of Barcelona and a member of the Research Project on Performing Arts in Catalonia, promoted by the Institut del Teatre. His noteworthy publications include his work on post-war theatre and independent theatre in Spain, for instance El teatre independent a Catalunya (2003) and articles on Ricard Salvat, Josep Palau i Fabre and the Escola Adrià Gual, published in magazines like Assaig de Teatre, Matèria, Siglo XXI and Serra d’Or.
Inmaculada López Silva.Theatre critic, writer and professor of Drama Theory at the Advanced School of Dramatic Art of Galicia, and professor of the M.A. in Performing Arts at the University of Vigo. She has also worked as a researcher at the University of Santiago de Compostela and City University, New York. She is a founding member of the Association for Contemporary Theatre Research in 21st-Century Theatre, and is part of the editorial board of the publications ECO and Revista Galega de Teatro, as well as author of Un abrente teatral (Abrente Theatre, 2002) and Teatro e canonización (Theatre and Canonisation, 2004).
-
November 21, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Round-table. A Heterogeneous Landscape: Trends and Models
Salvador Távora, Lluís Pasqual, Guillermo Heras, Gloria Muñoz and Juan Ruesga.
Moderated by: Cristina SantolariaDiverse researchers specialised in the theatre staging from this period will discuss its context in history, the role of political militancy in its development, and its mythologies and legacy. What remains today from independent theatre?
Salvador Távora. Actor, stage designer, and a leading figure in independent theatre in Spain. In 1971 he founded the theatre company La Cuadra, in which he composed over twenty works, including Quejío (1972-1975), Nanas de espinas (1982-1985), Piel de toro (1985-1987), Picasso andaluz o la muerte del minotauro (1992-1994), Carmen (1996) and Mayorales (2004), to name but a few. In 2007 La Cuadra opened its own permanent theatre, Teatro Salvador Távora, which has since been the venue for the theatre productions of the artist and his company.
Lluís Pasqual. Theatre director. Founder of Teatre Lliure, Barcelona, in 1976, where he directed Camí de nit, his first stage project. In 1983 he became director of the National Drama Centre - Teatro María Guerrero, in Madrid. From 1990 to 1996 he directed Odéon - Théâtre de l’Europe, Paris, and was head of stage design at the Venice Biennale between 1995 and 1996. From 1998 to 2000 he co-directed the Teatre Lliure and in 2004 he joined the Teatro Arriaga in Bilbao as artistic advisor. Since 2011, and for the second time, he has been director of Teatre Lliure.
Guillermo Heras. Actor and theatre director. He has directed the Tábano Group (1974–1983) and the National Centre of New Theatre Trends (1983–1993), and is editor of the collections Nuevo Teatro Español (New Spanish Theatre), Nueva Escena (New Stage) and Teatro Español Contemporáneo (Contemporary Spanish Theatre). Moreover, he is the founder of the Teatro del Astillero theatre company, and is currently director of the Muestra de Teatro Español de Autores Contemporáneos (Festival of Contemporary Authors of Spanish Theatre). He was awarded the Premio Nacional de Teatro (National Theatre Award) in 1994, and the Premio Lorca de Teatro (Lorca Theatre Award) in 1997.
Gloria Muñoz. Actress. In 1970 she joined the Tábano Group with Castañuela 70, directed by Juan Margallo. With Tábano she has worked on a number of staging projects, which include La soledad de Robinsón Crusoe, La ópera del bandido and Cambio de tercio. With Los Goliardos she performed in La boda de los pequeños burgueses, directed by Ángel Facio. In 1978 she moved to Barcelona, to the La Villaroel theatre, to join the company La Favorita, performing Sopa de mijo para cenar and Tenía dos pistolas con los ojos blancos y negros, directed by José A. Ortega.
Juan Ruesga. Stage designer. He has developed an important body of work in theory and analysis through his publications and lectures at numerous universities and institutions. At present, he is director of the research centre Ruesga Theater Lab, vice-president of the Academy of Theatre Arts of Spain, and vice-president of the OISTAT Association Spain (Organisation Internationale des Scénografes, Techniciens et Architectes de Théatre). Moreover, he is a guest lecturer in the M.A. in Live Performing Arts at the University of Seville, and professor of the M.A. in Advanced Theatre Studies at the International University of La Rioja.
-
November 23, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Screening
Screening of a series of interviews, conducted by the INAEM Theatre Documentation Centre as part of Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980, with some of the leading figures from this time period: Antonio Malonda, José Luis Alonso de Santos, Gloria Muñoz, Juan Antonio Quintana, Juan Margallo, Paco Vidal, Fermín Cabal and Guillermo Heras.
Screening of the documentary Independent Theatre in Andalusia. The Origin of the Present, produced by the Andalusian Documentation Centre of Performing Arts, which compiles fragments from statements by leading figures from independent theatre in Andalusia, such as Alfonso Zurro, Pedro Álvarez- Ossorio, Amparo Rubiales and Ricardo Luna, among others.
-
November 25, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Berta Muñoz
Cracks in the System
Censorship and independent theatre are two closely linked phenomena. The pressing desire for independence that drove these playwrights and stage designers cannot be understood without the cultural and political climate they felt suffocated by in a dictatorship that stretched out its tentacles to reach the furthest corners of public and private space. The propaganda system drawn up during the Spanish Civil War would be kept alive, with changes that were more superficial than real, until 1978. Theatre, socially engaged art par excellence, would address this lack of freedom by developing allegories, and by means of different expressive mechanisms enabling it to seep through the cracks of a highly rigid system lacking its own cultural project, prevailing more through the new audiences that surfaced than through traditional ones.
Berta Muñoz.Theatre historian. She is author of El teatro crítico español durante el franquismo, visto por sus censores (Spanish Critical Theatre During the Franco Regime, Seen through its Censors, 2005), Expedientes de la censura teatral franquista (Records from Francoist Theatre Censorship, 2006, 2 vols.) and Censura y teatro del exilio (Censorship and Theatre in Exile, 2010). She is currently a professor at the Autonomous University of Madrid and works in the Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Culture, publishing to date two volumes from the series Fuentes y recursos para el estudio del teatro español: mapa de la documentación teatral en España (Sources and Resources for the Study of Spanish Theatre: A Map of Theatre Documentation in Spain, 2011) and Guía de obras de referencia y consulta (A Guide to Reference Works, 2012).
-
November 26, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Pedro G. Romero
Get Me Out of the Theatre… The Outbreak of Theatre without Theatre
The instability of the “independent theatre” classification is key to understanding the relationship between visual art and theatre from the sixties onwards. The so-called “theatrical shift”, the ferocious outcome of Michael Fried’s critique and his vilification of theatricality, grants privilege to the event, the performance and the situation. Modes of forming collective, militant audiences and even a new political status of merchandise prove that we are some way from the scenographic role official theatres allocate to fine arts. Installations, happenings and guerrilla theatre are tools shared by artists from different spheres, and, to some degree, it is on the fringes of the history of independent theatre where the project was realised. Ocaña, Darcy Lange’s operas and flamenco theatre would take this theatrical machine to extremes, whereby theatre without theatre would appear in unison.
Pedro G. Romero. Artist and theorist. A contributor to UNIA arteypensamiento (artandthought) and the Platform of Reflection on Cultural Politics (PRPC) in Seville and curator of the project Tratado de Paz (Peace Treaty) for San Sebastian 2016, European Capital of Culture. He also promotes the Independent Platform of Modern and contemporary Flamenco Studies. Furthermore, he is artistic director of the flamenco dancer and choreographer Israel Galván, and has worked with an array of artists, including Rocío Márquez and Tomás de Perrate. He curated the exhibition Ocaña. Actions, Acts, Activism 1973–1983 (Virreina de Barcelona, 2010, and Centro de Arte Montehermoso, Vitoria, 2011) and in 2009 his work was exhibited in the Museo Reina Sofía in the monographic exhibition Silo. Archivo F.X.
-
November 27, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. César de Vicente
An Approach to Independent Theatre
By virtue of different graphic and audiovisual materials from 1968–1979, loaned by documentation centres, the artistic conditions developed by independent theatre, the production and distribution of mediums used in its performances, forms of interpretation and representation, and the different aspects contributing to its specific nature in the theatrical landscape of the time, as well as how it would be reflected in future groups, are all analysed.
César de Vicente. Professor of Theory and Practice in Political Theatre from the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology at the Complutense University of Madrid. He is author of La escena constituyente. Teoría y práctica del teatro político (The Constituent Stage. The Theory and Practice of Political Theatre, 2013) and La dramaturgia política (Political Dramaturgy, in print). Moreover, he has also worked on the following publications: Peter Weiss: una estética de la resistencia (Peter Weiss: The Aesthetics of Resistance, 1996), El teatro político de Erwin Piscator (Erwin Piscator’s Political Theatre, 2001), Teatro de Alfonso Sastre (Alfonso Sastre’s Theatre, 2010) and Teatro, Política, Sociedad (Theatre, Politics, Society) by Erwin Piscator (2013).
Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980

Held on 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27 Nov 2015
During the 1960s and 1970s, independent theatre groups in Spain, brought together in their wholesale rejection of the Franco regime and their proximity to international alternative stage projects, revamped theatre from popular culture, university classrooms, alternative circuits and touring as a form of representation. This daring independent theatre embraced contemporary performance styles and appealed to new audiences, revolutionising stages in Spain and generating a long list of companies, encounters and festivals. Its chronology started in 1962, with the birth of the first collectives, and ended in 1980, the year of its self-proclaimed dissolution during the El Escorial Conversations.
This seminar sets out to present a global vision of that time period, one of the most relevant in the history of 20th-century theatre in Spain. Moving along the same lines as the seminar Dance in the 80s: The First Steps of Contemporary Dance in Spain (2013), centred on the development of contemporary dance in Spain after the Dictatorship, the seminar puts forward a study on the period that came immediately before in the field of theatre.
Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980* is a three-year-long network project that features the participation of the main theatre documentation centres in Spain: the Centre of Theatre Documentation (INAEM, Spain’s Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport), the Institut del Teatre (Provincial Council of Barcelona) and the Documentation Centre for the Performing Arts of Andalusia (the Department of Culture of the Regional Government of Andalusia). The project is built in various blocks: research on the period, the development of the public activities granting it visibility and the presentation of a digital platform that brings together information on the subject. The outcome of this collaborative work will see activities developed in Madrid, Barcelona and Seville, which host the institutions that make up the project.
* This three-year journey aims to celebrate the living memory of its leading figures, who, in one way or another, participate in the activities and documentation in this project so that today’s professionals and spectators, particularly the youngest, can discover and assess the protagonists from the time.
Related links
Organised by
Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Centro de Documentación Teatral (INAEM), Institut del Teatre and Centro de Documentación de las Artes Escénicas de Andalucía
Más actividades

Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art
23 February – 14 December 2026 – Check programme
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art is a study group aligned towards thinking about how certain contemporary artistic and cultural practices resist the referentiality that dominates the logics of production and the consumption of present-day art. At the centre of this proposal are the concepts of difficulty and deviation, under which it brings together any procedure capable of preventing artistic forms from being absorbed by a meaning that appears previous to and independent from its expression. By ensuring the perceptibility of their languages, difficulty invites us to think of meaning as the effect of a signifying tension; that is, as a productive and creative activity which, from the materiality of art objects, frees aesthetic experience from the representational mandate and those who participate in it from the passiveness associated with tasks of mimesis and decoding.
The economy of the referential norm translates the social logic of capitalism, where insidious forms of capturing subjectivity and meaning operate. In the early 1980s, and adopting a Marxist framework, poet Ron Silliman highlighted how this logic entailed separating language from any mark, gesture, script, form or syntax that might link it to the conditions of its production, rendering it fetichised (as if without a subject) and alienating its users in a use for which they are not responsible. This double dispossession encodes the political strategy of referential objectivity: with no subject and no trace of its own consistency, language is merely an object, that reality in which it disappears.
The political uses of referentiality, more sophisticated today than ever before, sustain the neoliberal-extractivist phase of capitalism that crosses through present-day societies politically, economically and aesthetically. Against them, fugitive artistic practices emerge which, drawing from Black and Queer studies and other subaltern critical positions, reject the objective limits of what exists, invent forms to name what lies outside what has already been named, and return to subjects the capacity to participate in processes of emission and interpretation.
Read from the standpoint of artistic work, the objective capture of referentiality may be called transparency. Viewed from a social contract that reproduces inequality in fixed identity positions, transparent in this objectivity are, precisely, the discourses that maintain the status quo of domination. Opposite the inferno of these discourses, this group aims to collectively explore, through deviant or fugitive works, the paradise of language that Monique Wittig encountered in the estranged practices of literature. For the political potency of difficulty — that is, its contribution to the utopia of a free language among equals — depends on making visible, first, its own deviations; from there, the norm that those deviations transgress; and finally, the narrowness of a norm which in no way exhausts the possibilities ofsaying, signifying, referring and producing a world.
From this denouncement of referential alienation, fetishisation and capture, Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art turns its attention to the strategies of resistance deployed by contemporary artists and poets. Its interest is directed towards proposals as evidently difficult or evasive as those of Gertrude Stein, Lyn Hejinian, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Kameelah Janan Rasheed, Kathy Acker, María Salgado and Ricardo Carreira, and as seemingly simple as those of Fernanda Laguna, Felix Gonzalez Torres and Cecilia Vicuña, among other examples that can be added according to the desires and dynamics of the group.
The ten study group sessions, held between February and December, combine theoretical seminars, work with artworks from the Museo Reina Sofía’s Collections and exhibitions, reading workshops and public programs. All these formats serve as spaces of encounter to think commonly about certain problems of poetics — that is, certain political questions — of contemporary writing and art.
Difficulty. Forms and Political Effects of Deviation in Writing and Contemporary Art inaugurates the research line Goodbye, Representation, through which the Museo Reina Sofía’s Studies Directorship seeks to explore the emergence of contemporary artistic and cultural practices which move away from representation as a dominant aesthetic-political strategy and redirect their attention toward artistic languages that question the tendency to point, name and fix, advocating instead for fugitive aesthetics. Over its three-year duration, this research line materializes in study groups, seminars, screenings and other forms of public programming.

LANDSCAPE TRANCE. THE FILMS OF OLIVER LAXE
From 5 to 28 February 2026 – check programme
Over this coming month of February, the Museo organises a complete retrospective on the filmography of Oliver Laxe. The series converses with the work HU/هُوَ. Dance as if no one were watching you, an installation by the Sirāt director conceived specifically for the Museo Reina Sofía’s Espacio 1, and includes the four feature-length films Laxe has made to date, as well as his short films and a four-session carte blanche programme, in which he will select works that chime with his films and creative concerns.
Oliver Laxe’s gaze is one of the most unique in the contemporary film landscape, his film-making a resilient, spiritual and transcultural space imbued with a cultural and social nomadism that reflects his life and beliefs and which, fundamentally, puts forward an anti-materialist ethic to deal with our times. His filmography, characterised by profound spirituality, a time of contemplation and a close connection to nature and the sacred, approaches universal themes such as redemption and the meaning of existence via stories that extend across remote, rural and timeless landscapes, and with atmospheres that draw on western and police film genres. His protagonists, largely amateur actors, cross through physical territories while travelling on inner journeys consumed by guilt, the desire for community reintegration and the realisation of an end goal they ignore. Nature, particularly desert and landscape, is another character, a living, pantheistic presence that conditions and reflects human conflicts. Stretched-out time, a focus on sensory experience and allusions to ancient religion situate us in a meditative conception of film which seeks to be a manifesto to re-enchant the world.
Within the series, the carte blanche sessions see the film-maker choose four films which map his obsessions: Sergei Dvortsevoy’s Highway (1999), which crosses the plains of Kazakhstan via a small travelling circus; Artavazd Peleshyan’s film The Seasons (1975), an ode to the passing of time through landscape; Trás-os-Montes (1976), an ethnographic work of fiction, made by Antònio Reis and Margarida Cordeiro, spotlighting a Portuguese farming community and their rituals and purity of life; and Kaneto Shindo’s The Naked Island, which shows a family of four’s daily struggle in a natural paradise.

Cultural Work
Thursday, 12 February 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
Session number two looks to approach film as a place from which cultural work is made visible and processes of production engage in dialogue with artistic creation. From this premise, the session focuses on exploring how audiovisual content is produced, assembled and distributed, from the hands that handle the images to the bodies that participate in its circulation. The aim is to reflect on the invisible effort, precarity and forms of collaboration that uphold cultural life, that transform the filmic experience into an act that recognises and cares for common work.

Alberto Greco. Viva el arte vivo
Tuesday, 10 February 2026 – 7pm
In conjunction with the opening of the exhibition Alberto Greco. Viva el arte vivo, Fernando Davis, the show’s curator, and Amanda de la Garza, the Museo Reina Sofía’s deputy artist director, will converse in the Nouvel Building’s Auditorium 400 on the life and work of the Argentinian artist, a core figure in experimental avant-garde art.
The title of both exhibition and conversation originates from the proclamation “Long Live Arte Vivo” Alberto Greco (Buenos Aires, 1931— Barcelona, 1965) disseminated around the streets and on the walls of Rome. For Greco, arte vivo was an art of the future, an art based on a set of irreverent and untimely gestures, of adventures open to unpredictability melding with life, and which began in 1962, prior to his coining of the term “vivo-dito”. In his Manifiesto dito dell´arte vivo (Dito Arte-Vivo Manifesto), which he pasted on the walls of Genoa, Greco encouraged new contact “with the living elements of our reality: movement, time, people, conversations, smells, rumours, places, situations”. He would also burst into the everyday of Madrid’s streets as he convened a “vivo-dito moment”, culminating in the burning of a canvas painted collectively in Madrid’s Lavapiés neighbourhood.
In addition to founding arte vivo, Alberto Greco was an informalist painter, a queer flâneur, a poet and sometime actor. This intense journey of Greco’s life and art is closely connected to the migrant route he embarked upon in 1950 in Buenos Aires, taking in Atacama and Humahuaca, Paris, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Genoa, Rome, Madrid, Piedralaves, New York and Ibiza and ending abruptly in Barcelona, where he took his own life shortly after writing his final great work, the novel Besos brujos (Bewitching Kisses, 1965).
These inaugural conversations, part of the main working strands of the Museo’s Public Programmes Area, aim to explore in greater depth the exhibition narratives of the shows organised by the Museo from the perspective of artists, curators and specialists.
![Basel Abbas y Ruanne Abou-Rahme, At Those Terrifying Frontiers Where the Existence and Disappearance of People Fade Into Each Other [En esas fronteras aterradoras donde la existencia y la desaparición de personas se disuelven entre sí], 2019](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Colecci%C3%B3n/abbasabourahme.png.webp)
Gaza and Aestheticide
Tuesday February 10, 2026 – 16:00 h
“This seminar examines the systematic destruction of Palestinian collective sensibility — what we might call ‛aestheticide’ — that has accompanied Israel’s genocide and ecocide in Gaza, and considers the conditions of artistic practice in its aftermath. Over more than two years, the demolition of universities, archives, museums, and libraries has not only erased cultural and intellectual infrastructure but has also targeted the very possibility of representation itself. The destruction of a people has been accompanied by the destruction of their image, their history, and their capacity to be known: reportage, scholarship, and cultural memory have been deliberately undermined, with media institutions, universities, and museums often complicit in this repression. Gaza consequently functions as a rehearsal space for a possible global future — of fascism, post-liberal authoritarianism, militarized borders, and AI-enabled warfare —, a laboratory for an emerging world order. What, then, becomes of critical analysis and resistance under these conditions? And what becomes of aesthetics and politics?”
—T.J. DemosThis seminar takes place thanks to the art historian’s invitation to Spain by the Miró Foundation. In the context of the museum, it engages in dialogue with a broader line of work on the climate emergency and decolonial perspectives developed within the Museum of the Commons project (2023–2026) of the L’Internationale network, of which the Museo Reina Sofía is a member; as well as with some of the questions that animate the study group Aesthetics of Peace and Desertion Tactics. Finally, it is also embedded in a wider strategy of support for and commitment to the artistic and discursive practices of Palestinian artists and cultural practitioners, most clearly reflected in the TEJA network.