-
November 19, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Eduardo Pérez Rasilla. Approaches to Independent Theatre in Spain
Despite the unstable and perilous road it travelled down, independent theatre transformed numerous aspects of the stage in Spain, and was preceded by the considerable impetus of university theatre in the late fifties and early sixties, coming into being when the latter started to see its possibilities cut short. From that time on, until halfway through the seventies, independent theatre would conceive aesthetically innovative and politically relevant performances to reach different audiences. Touring and exhibitions of work in non-theatre spaces, as well as explorations of the possibilities of collective creation and the exposure of ideas in other artistic languages and traditions, would become the distinguishing features of the formations that opposed the poetics and ideology of run-of-the-mill, anachronistic commercial theatre in a society that demanded sweeping changes to structures and relations.
Eduardo Pérez Rasilla. Head professor of Spanish Literature at the University Carlos III of Madrid. He previously lectured at the Royal School of Dramatic Arts (RESAD), in Madrid, and has been a member of editorial boards of magazines such as Estreno, Acotaciones, Don Galán, Revista Galega de Teatro and ADE-Teatro. He has written articles for Spanish and international magazines, and is the author of numerous chapters in books on collective works. He has also written El premio Lope de Vega. Historia y desarrollo (The Lope de Vega Award. History and Development, co-written with Julio Checa, 2006) and Antología del Teatro Breve Español (1898-1940) (An Anthology of Teatro Breve in Spain, [1898–1940]), in 1997.
-
November 20, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Round-table. Theatre as a Social Catalyst
César de Vicente Hernando, Enric Ciurans and Inmaculada López Silva.
Moderated by: Mercé SaumellDiverse researchers specialised in the theatre staging from this period will discuss its context in history, the role of political militancy in its development, and its mythologies and legacy. What remains today from independent theatre?
César de Vicente Hernando. Professor of Theory and Practice in Political Theatre from the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology at the Complutense University of Madrid. He is author of La escena constituyente. Teoría y práctica del teatro político (The Constituent Stage. The Theory and Practice of Political Theatre, 2013) and La dramaturgia política (Political Dramaturgy, in print). Moreover, he has also worked on the following publications: Peter Weiss: una estética de la resistencia (Peter Weiss: The Aesthetics of Resistance, 1996), El teatro político de Erwin Piscator (Erwin Piscator’s Political Theatre, 2001), Teatro de Alfonso Sastre (Alfonso Sastre’s Theatre, 2010) and Teatro, Política, Sociedad (Theatre, Politics, Society) by Erwin Piscator (2013).
Enric Ciurans. Professor of Performing Arts History at the University of Barcelona and a member of the Research Project on Performing Arts in Catalonia, promoted by the Institut del Teatre. His noteworthy publications include his work on post-war theatre and independent theatre in Spain, for instance El teatre independent a Catalunya (2003) and articles on Ricard Salvat, Josep Palau i Fabre and the Escola Adrià Gual, published in magazines like Assaig de Teatre, Matèria, Siglo XXI and Serra d’Or.
Inmaculada López Silva.Theatre critic, writer and professor of Drama Theory at the Advanced School of Dramatic Art of Galicia, and professor of the M.A. in Performing Arts at the University of Vigo. She has also worked as a researcher at the University of Santiago de Compostela and City University, New York. She is a founding member of the Association for Contemporary Theatre Research in 21st-Century Theatre, and is part of the editorial board of the publications ECO and Revista Galega de Teatro, as well as author of Un abrente teatral (Abrente Theatre, 2002) and Teatro e canonización (Theatre and Canonisation, 2004).
-
November 21, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Round-table. A Heterogeneous Landscape: Trends and Models
Salvador Távora, Lluís Pasqual, Guillermo Heras, Gloria Muñoz and Juan Ruesga.
Moderated by: Cristina SantolariaDiverse researchers specialised in the theatre staging from this period will discuss its context in history, the role of political militancy in its development, and its mythologies and legacy. What remains today from independent theatre?
Salvador Távora. Actor, stage designer, and a leading figure in independent theatre in Spain. In 1971 he founded the theatre company La Cuadra, in which he composed over twenty works, including Quejío (1972-1975), Nanas de espinas (1982-1985), Piel de toro (1985-1987), Picasso andaluz o la muerte del minotauro (1992-1994), Carmen (1996) and Mayorales (2004), to name but a few. In 2007 La Cuadra opened its own permanent theatre, Teatro Salvador Távora, which has since been the venue for the theatre productions of the artist and his company.
Lluís Pasqual. Theatre director. Founder of Teatre Lliure, Barcelona, in 1976, where he directed Camí de nit, his first stage project. In 1983 he became director of the National Drama Centre - Teatro María Guerrero, in Madrid. From 1990 to 1996 he directed Odéon - Théâtre de l’Europe, Paris, and was head of stage design at the Venice Biennale between 1995 and 1996. From 1998 to 2000 he co-directed the Teatre Lliure and in 2004 he joined the Teatro Arriaga in Bilbao as artistic advisor. Since 2011, and for the second time, he has been director of Teatre Lliure.
Guillermo Heras. Actor and theatre director. He has directed the Tábano Group (1974–1983) and the National Centre of New Theatre Trends (1983–1993), and is editor of the collections Nuevo Teatro Español (New Spanish Theatre), Nueva Escena (New Stage) and Teatro Español Contemporáneo (Contemporary Spanish Theatre). Moreover, he is the founder of the Teatro del Astillero theatre company, and is currently director of the Muestra de Teatro Español de Autores Contemporáneos (Festival of Contemporary Authors of Spanish Theatre). He was awarded the Premio Nacional de Teatro (National Theatre Award) in 1994, and the Premio Lorca de Teatro (Lorca Theatre Award) in 1997.
Gloria Muñoz. Actress. In 1970 she joined the Tábano Group with Castañuela 70, directed by Juan Margallo. With Tábano she has worked on a number of staging projects, which include La soledad de Robinsón Crusoe, La ópera del bandido and Cambio de tercio. With Los Goliardos she performed in La boda de los pequeños burgueses, directed by Ángel Facio. In 1978 she moved to Barcelona, to the La Villaroel theatre, to join the company La Favorita, performing Sopa de mijo para cenar and Tenía dos pistolas con los ojos blancos y negros, directed by José A. Ortega.
Juan Ruesga. Stage designer. He has developed an important body of work in theory and analysis through his publications and lectures at numerous universities and institutions. At present, he is director of the research centre Ruesga Theater Lab, vice-president of the Academy of Theatre Arts of Spain, and vice-president of the OISTAT Association Spain (Organisation Internationale des Scénografes, Techniciens et Architectes de Théatre). Moreover, he is a guest lecturer in the M.A. in Live Performing Arts at the University of Seville, and professor of the M.A. in Advanced Theatre Studies at the International University of La Rioja.
-
November 23, 2015 Sabatini Building, Auditorium
Screening
Screening of a series of interviews, conducted by the INAEM Theatre Documentation Centre as part of Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980, with some of the leading figures from this time period: Antonio Malonda, José Luis Alonso de Santos, Gloria Muñoz, Juan Antonio Quintana, Juan Margallo, Paco Vidal, Fermín Cabal and Guillermo Heras.
Screening of the documentary Independent Theatre in Andalusia. The Origin of the Present, produced by the Andalusian Documentation Centre of Performing Arts, which compiles fragments from statements by leading figures from independent theatre in Andalusia, such as Alfonso Zurro, Pedro Álvarez- Ossorio, Amparo Rubiales and Ricardo Luna, among others.
-
November 25, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Berta Muñoz
Cracks in the System
Censorship and independent theatre are two closely linked phenomena. The pressing desire for independence that drove these playwrights and stage designers cannot be understood without the cultural and political climate they felt suffocated by in a dictatorship that stretched out its tentacles to reach the furthest corners of public and private space. The propaganda system drawn up during the Spanish Civil War would be kept alive, with changes that were more superficial than real, until 1978. Theatre, socially engaged art par excellence, would address this lack of freedom by developing allegories, and by means of different expressive mechanisms enabling it to seep through the cracks of a highly rigid system lacking its own cultural project, prevailing more through the new audiences that surfaced than through traditional ones.
Berta Muñoz.Theatre historian. She is author of El teatro crítico español durante el franquismo, visto por sus censores (Spanish Critical Theatre During the Franco Regime, Seen through its Censors, 2005), Expedientes de la censura teatral franquista (Records from Francoist Theatre Censorship, 2006, 2 vols.) and Censura y teatro del exilio (Censorship and Theatre in Exile, 2010). She is currently a professor at the Autonomous University of Madrid and works in the Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Culture, publishing to date two volumes from the series Fuentes y recursos para el estudio del teatro español: mapa de la documentación teatral en España (Sources and Resources for the Study of Spanish Theatre: A Map of Theatre Documentation in Spain, 2011) and Guía de obras de referencia y consulta (A Guide to Reference Works, 2012).
-
November 26, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. Pedro G. Romero
Get Me Out of the Theatre… The Outbreak of Theatre without Theatre
The instability of the “independent theatre” classification is key to understanding the relationship between visual art and theatre from the sixties onwards. The so-called “theatrical shift”, the ferocious outcome of Michael Fried’s critique and his vilification of theatricality, grants privilege to the event, the performance and the situation. Modes of forming collective, militant audiences and even a new political status of merchandise prove that we are some way from the scenographic role official theatres allocate to fine arts. Installations, happenings and guerrilla theatre are tools shared by artists from different spheres, and, to some degree, it is on the fringes of the history of independent theatre where the project was realised. Ocaña, Darcy Lange’s operas and flamenco theatre would take this theatrical machine to extremes, whereby theatre without theatre would appear in unison.
Pedro G. Romero. Artist and theorist. A contributor to UNIA arteypensamiento (artandthought) and the Platform of Reflection on Cultural Politics (PRPC) in Seville and curator of the project Tratado de Paz (Peace Treaty) for San Sebastian 2016, European Capital of Culture. He also promotes the Independent Platform of Modern and contemporary Flamenco Studies. Furthermore, he is artistic director of the flamenco dancer and choreographer Israel Galván, and has worked with an array of artists, including Rocío Márquez and Tomás de Perrate. He curated the exhibition Ocaña. Actions, Acts, Activism 1973–1983 (Virreina de Barcelona, 2010, and Centro de Arte Montehermoso, Vitoria, 2011) and in 2009 his work was exhibited in the Museo Reina Sofía in the monographic exhibition Silo. Archivo F.X.
-
November 27, 2015 Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Lecture. César de Vicente
An Approach to Independent Theatre
By virtue of different graphic and audiovisual materials from 1968–1979, loaned by documentation centres, the artistic conditions developed by independent theatre, the production and distribution of mediums used in its performances, forms of interpretation and representation, and the different aspects contributing to its specific nature in the theatrical landscape of the time, as well as how it would be reflected in future groups, are all analysed.
César de Vicente. Professor of Theory and Practice in Political Theatre from the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology at the Complutense University of Madrid. He is author of La escena constituyente. Teoría y práctica del teatro político (The Constituent Stage. The Theory and Practice of Political Theatre, 2013) and La dramaturgia política (Political Dramaturgy, in print). Moreover, he has also worked on the following publications: Peter Weiss: una estética de la resistencia (Peter Weiss: The Aesthetics of Resistance, 1996), El teatro político de Erwin Piscator (Erwin Piscator’s Political Theatre, 2001), Teatro de Alfonso Sastre (Alfonso Sastre’s Theatre, 2010) and Teatro, Política, Sociedad (Theatre, Politics, Society) by Erwin Piscator (2013).
Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980

Held on 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27 Nov 2015
During the 1960s and 1970s, independent theatre groups in Spain, brought together in their wholesale rejection of the Franco regime and their proximity to international alternative stage projects, revamped theatre from popular culture, university classrooms, alternative circuits and touring as a form of representation. This daring independent theatre embraced contemporary performance styles and appealed to new audiences, revolutionising stages in Spain and generating a long list of companies, encounters and festivals. Its chronology started in 1962, with the birth of the first collectives, and ended in 1980, the year of its self-proclaimed dissolution during the El Escorial Conversations.
This seminar sets out to present a global vision of that time period, one of the most relevant in the history of 20th-century theatre in Spain. Moving along the same lines as the seminar Dance in the 80s: The First Steps of Contemporary Dance in Spain (2013), centred on the development of contemporary dance in Spain after the Dictatorship, the seminar puts forward a study on the period that came immediately before in the field of theatre.
Independent Theatre in Spain: 1962–1980* is a three-year-long network project that features the participation of the main theatre documentation centres in Spain: the Centre of Theatre Documentation (INAEM, Spain’s Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport), the Institut del Teatre (Provincial Council of Barcelona) and the Documentation Centre for the Performing Arts of Andalusia (the Department of Culture of the Regional Government of Andalusia). The project is built in various blocks: research on the period, the development of the public activities granting it visibility and the presentation of a digital platform that brings together information on the subject. The outcome of this collaborative work will see activities developed in Madrid, Barcelona and Seville, which host the institutions that make up the project.
* This three-year journey aims to celebrate the living memory of its leading figures, who, in one way or another, participate in the activities and documentation in this project so that today’s professionals and spectators, particularly the youngest, can discover and assess the protagonists from the time.
Related links
Organised by
Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Centro de Documentación Teatral (INAEM), Institut del Teatre and Centro de Documentación de las Artes Escénicas de Andalucía
Más actividades

Institutional Decentralisation
Thursday, 21 May 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
This fourth and final session centres on films that take the museum away from its axis and make it gaze from the edges. Pieces that work with that which is normally left out: peripheral territories, unpolished aesthetics, clumsy gestures full of intent. Instead of possessing an institutional lustre, here they are rough, precarious and strange in appearance, legitimate forms of making and showing culture. The idea is to think about what happens when central authority is displaced, when the ugly and the uncomfortable are not hidden, when they are recognised as part of the commons. Film that does not seek to be to one’s liking, but to open space and allow other ways of seeing and inhabiting the museum to enter stage.
![Tracey Rose, The Black Sun Black Star and Moon [La luna estrella negro y negro sol], 2014.](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Obra/AD07091_2.jpg.webp)
On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination
Monday 27, Tuesday 28 and Wednesday 29 of April, 2026 – 16:00 h
The seminar On Black Study: Towards a Black Poethics of Contamination proposes Black Study as a critical and methodological practice that has emerged in and against racial capitalism, colonial modernity and institutional capture. Framed through what the invited researcher and practitioner Ishy Pryce-Parchment terms a Black poethics of contamination, the seminar considers what it might mean to think Blackness (and therefore Black Study) as contagious, diffuse and spreadable matter. To do so, it enacts a constellation of diasporic methodologies and black aesthetic practices that harbor “contamination” -ideas that travel through texts, geographies, bodies and histories- as a method and as a condition.
If Blackness enters Western modernity from the position of the Middle Passage and its afterlives, it also names a condition from which alternative modes of being, knowing and relating are continually forged. From within this errant boundarylessness, Black creative-intellectual practice unfolds as what might be called a history of touches: transmissions, residues and socialities that unsettle the fantasy of pure or self-contained knowledge.
Situated within Black radical aesthetics, Black feminist theory and diasporic poetics, the seminar traces a genealogy of Black Study not as an object of analysis but as methodological propositions that continue to shape contemporary aesthetic and political life. Against mastery as the horizon of study, the group shifts attention from what we know to how we know. It foregrounds creative Black methodological practices—fahima ife’s anindex (via Fred Moten), Katherine McKittrick’s expansive use of the footnote, citation as relational and loving labour, the aesthetics of Black miscellanea, and Christina Sharpe’s practices of annotation—as procedures that disorganise dominant regimes of knowledge. In this sense, Black Study is approached not as a discrete academic field but as a feel for knowing and knowledge: a constellation of insurgent practices—reading, gathering, listening, annotating, refusing, world-making—that operate both within and beyond the university.
The study sessions propose to experiment with form in order to embrace how ‘black people have always used interdisciplinary methodologies to explain, explore, and story the world.’ Through engagements with thinkers and practitioners such as Katherine McKittrick, C.L.R. James, Sylvia Wynter, Christina Sharpe, Fred Moten, Tina Campt, Hilton Als, John Akomfrah, fahima ife and Dionne Brand, we ask: What might it mean to study together, incompletely and without recourse to individuation? How might aesthetic practice function as a poethical intervention in the ongoing work of what Sylvia Wynter calls the practice of doing humanness?

Intergenerationality
Thursday, 9 April 2026 – 5:30pm
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
The third session gazes at film as a place from which to dismantle the idea of one sole history and one sole time. From a decolonial and queer perspective, it explores films which break the straight line of past-present-future, which mix memories, slow progress and leave space for rhythms which customarily make no room for official accounts. Here the images open cracks through which bodies, voices and affects appear, disrupting archive and questioning who narrates, and from where and for whom. The proposal is at once simple and ambitious: use film to imagine other modes of remembering, belonging and projecting futures we have not yet been able to live.

Remedios Zafra
Thursday March 19, 2026 - 19:00 h
The José Luis Brea Chair, dedicated to reflecting on the image and the epistemology of visuality in contemporary culture, opens its program with an inaugural lecture by essayist and thinker Remedios Zafra.
“That the contemporary antifeminist upsurge is constructed as an anti-intellectual drive is no coincidence; the two feed into one another. To advance a reactionary discourse that defends inequality, it is necessary to challenge gender studies and gender-equality policies, but also to devalue the very foundations of knowledge in which these have been most intensely developed over recent decades—while also undermining their institutional support: universities, art and research centers, and academic culture.
Feminism has been deeply linked to the affirmation of the most committed humanist thought. Periods of enlightenment and moments of transition toward more just social forms—sustained by education—have been when feminist demands have emerged most strongly. Awareness and achievements in equality increase when education plays a leading social role; thus, devaluing intellectual work also contributes to harming feminism, and vice versa, insofar as the bond between knowledge and feminism is not only conceptual and historical, but also intimate and political.
Today, antifeminism is used globally as the symbolic adhesive of far-right movements, in parallel with the devaluation of forms of knowledge emerging from the university and from science—mistreated by hoaxes and disinformation on social networks and through the spectacularization of life mediated by screens. These are consequences bound up with the primacy of a scopic value that for some time has been denigrating thought and positioning what is most seen as what is most valuable within the normalized mediation of technology. This inertia coexists with techno-libertarian proclamations that reactivate a patriarchy that uses the resentment of many men as a seductive and cohesive force to preserve and inflame privileges in the new world as techno-scenario.
This lecture will address this epochal context, delving into the synchronicity of these upsurges through an additional parallel between forms of patriarchal domination and techno-labor domination. A parallel in which feminism and intellectual work are both being harmed, while also sending signals that in both lie emancipatory responses to today’s reactionary turns and the neutralization of critique. This consonance would also speak to how the perverse patriarchal basis that turns women into sustainers of their own subordination finds its equivalent in the encouraged self-exploitation of cultural workers; in the legitimation of affective capital and symbolic capital as sufficient forms of payment; in the blurring of boundaries between life and work and in domestic isolation; or in the pressure to please and comply as an extended patriarchal form—today linked to the feigned enthusiasm of precarious workers, but also to technological adulation. In response to possible resistance and intellectual action, patriarchy has associated feminists with a future foretold as unhappy for them, equating “thought and consciousness” with unhappiness—where these have in fact been (and continue to be) levers of autonomy and emancipation.”
— Remedios Zafra

27th Contemporary Art Conservation Conference
Wednesday, 4, and Thursday, 5 March 2026
The 27th Contemporary Art Conservation Conference, organised by the Museo Reina Sofía’s Department of Conservation and Restoration, with the sponsorship of the Mapfre Foundation, is held on 4 and 5 March 2026. This international encounter sets out to share and debate experience and research, open new channels of study and reflect on conservation and the professional practice of restorers.
This edition will be held with in-person and online attendance formats, occurring simultaneously, via twenty-minute interventions followed by a five-minute Q&A.