
Held on 09 Mar 2023
Setting out from the exhibition Evil Eye: The Parallel History of Optics and Ballistics, held at Tabakalera Centro Internacional de Cultura Contemporánea (Donostia-San Sebastián), this seminar aims to trace a history of the development of modern technology, punctuating ideas around vision and cognition. It is structured around three lectures, followed by a round-table discussion, which aim to analyse the forms with which we have historically been and are trained to observe the world, the accelerated fragmentation of which keeps on triggering the nostalgia of a mystical union with the past, where an eternal and long-lasting order is projected. In centuries gone by, these trends gave rise to strange alliances between disparate forces and currents of thought.
Assuming that our forms of attention, observation and objectivation are contingent and determined by a disciplinary apparatus of learning which includes our voluntary participation, three authors from different disciplines invite us to think about certain processes of mythification in relation to Western techno-scientific culture. Consequently, there will be an analysis of the configuration and development of aesthetic categories, imperial wars, forms of observation and classification and economic models and data analysis.
The activity is part of the Necropolitics, Aesthetics and Memory Seminar, inside the Museo Reina Sofía’s Study Programme Connective Tissue.
[dropdown]
Fernando Esposito is an assistant professor in the Department of Modern History at Universität Konstanz. His PhD thesis, Fascism, Aviation and Mythical Modernity (Basingstoke, 2015), examines the discourse of aviation in Italy and Germany and interprets it as a project of fascist mythical modernity. More recently, he has finished his manuscript Habilitations on the topos of the “contemporaneity of the non-contemporary” (Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen). The book is a contribution to the history and theory of historical times, examining the transformation of European conceptions of time and history and the chronopolitics that emerged in modern temporality.
Oier Etxeberria oversees Tabakalera’s Contemporary Art area.
Germán Labrador is the director of the Museo Reina Sofía’s Department of Public Activities.
Jaume Navarro is a research professor at Ikerbasque. Basque Foundation for Science, at the University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. After studying physics and philosophy, he began to focus on research around the history of science (particularly the history of physics), perceptions and historical developments of the notion of science and its relationship to religion. Further, he has worked as a researcher at the University of Cambridge, Imperial College London, the University of Exeter and Instituto Max Planck de Historia de la Ciencia, and has published numerous research articles and books for publishers such as Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press. His latest book Ciencia-religión y sus tradiciones inventadas. Un recorrido historiográfico (Science-Religion and their Invented Traditions. A Historiographic Journey, Tecnos, 2022) explores the relationships between science, religion and nationalism.
Ana Teixeira Pinto is a writer and cultural theorist who lives in Berlin. She is a professor at the Braunschweig University of Art and a theory tutor at the Dutch Art Institute. Her writings have been published in magazines such as Third Text, Afterall, e-flux journal, Manifesta Journal and Texte zur Kunst, and she is the editor of a collection of books on the anti-political, published by Sternberg Press. With Kader Attia and Anselm Franke, she organised The White West: Whose Universal, a series of lectures and podcasts held at HKW Berlin, and was also a member of the artistic team at the 12th Berlin Biennale (2012).
[/dropdown]
5pm
Presentation and welcome
— Conducted by Germán Labrador (Museo Reina Sofía) and Oier Etxeberria (Tabakalera)
5:15pm
Fly! Fascism’s Fascination with Flying (in English with simultaneous interpreting)
— Conducted by Fernando Esposito (Universität Konstanz)
With technological innovation and the fascinating paradigm of modernity, aviation was a sought-after symbol which was exploited in the ideological conflicts that swept war-ravaged Europe in the early twentieth century. Aeroplanes brought a sense of admiration and those who flew them were encircled by an air of audacity, life and youth, turning the heroic aviator — defying death, thrill-seeking — into the embodiment of the new fascist man. Thus, flying became a metaphor for fascism and the plane and the aviator its technoid totems, symbolising at once revolutionary dynamism and the destructive power of fascist movements and the eternal order they tried to erect.
5:50pm
Élan Locomotif (in English with simultaneous interpreting)
—Conducted by Ana Teixeira Pinto (Braunschweig University of Art)
The early years of the twentieth century were characterised by the search for supermen, organised around an evolutionary blueprint, within which technology would come to be the apex. In 1910, aviation was state-of-the-art technology and flying was used as a metaphor for everything the Futurists wanted to encode as elevated (form, man, future), contradicting what they considered to be low and debased (women, matter, past). At the same time, the rebellion against Scientism in the nineteenth century was articulated around vitalism, a current of thought which opposed vital aspects of the mechanical. This lecture explores Filippo Tommaso Marinetti’s novel Mafarka le futuriste. Roman Africain (Mafarka the Futurist. An African Novel, 1910), in which the maximum expression of the will for power is the airplane form of Gazourmah (the hybrid child of Mafarka in the book).
6:25pm
Searching for the Best Representation. Objectivity in History, Objectivity in Science
—Conducted by Jaume Navarro (University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea)
The search for the “real” or “true” representation of a physical object, a human situation or a subjective emotion has long been the subject of debate between artists, naturalists, scientists and historians. This lecture, following the work of science historians Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison, examines the different notions of “objectivity” throughout modern history, zooming in on the photographic image which gave rise to a new form of mechanical representation, supposedly free from values and devoid of human will. The discovery of X-rays, however, introduced a series of challenges to this type of image and the way in which it had been observed. The issue was related to who must interpret these new images and how the accidental discovery of X-rays must be understood. The former is in relation to the reduced objectivity of science experts, the latter to the history of nuclear physics and the atomic bomb.
7pm
Round-table Discussion
—Debate with Fernando Esposito, Jaume Navarro and Ana Teixeira Pinto. Moderated by Oier Etxeberria
Organised by
Museo Reina Sofía
Inside the framework of
Connective Tissue. The Museo Reina Sofía’s Study Programme: Necropolitics, Aesthetics and Memory Seminar
Related links
Seminario organizado a partir de una investigación con Tabakalera Centro Internacional de Cultura Contemporánea (Donostia-San Sebastián), en torno a la exposición Evil Eye - La historia paralela de la óptica y la balística
Participants
Participants
Más actividades

Dear Americas
Friday 29 May and 5 June, 2026
In these films, Marilú Mallet travels to Solentiname, in Nicaragua, and Andahuaylillas, in Peru, to paint a portrait of communities which resist the severity of forced industrialisation. In Solentiname, the focus is on the poet and priest Ernesto Cardenal’s founding of a Christian, poetic and revolutionary utopia, while in Andahuaylillas, a town close to Cuzco, Mallet explores the multiple layers of Andean culture.

A Poetics of the Subject
Thursday 28 May and 4 June, 2026
In the tension between documentary and fiction, between the rawness of a tragic political present and narrative escape, lies the truth of the exile’s condition. In Journal inachevé (Unfinished Diary, 1982) Marilú Mallet experiments with her own subjectivity, moving from affirmation to doubt. In Double Portrait (2000), María Luisa Señoret paints her daughter Marilú, who records the process. In this circular relationship, the film-maker constructs a poetics of the portrait as something perpetually unfinished, a process of exploration in which memory, identity and political history merge to become blurred.

Institutional Decentralisation
28 MAY 2026
This series is organised by equipoMotor, a group of teenagers, young people and older people who have participated in the Museo Reina Sofía’s previous community education projects, and is structured around four themed blocks that pivot on the monstrous.
This fourth and final session centres on films that take the museum away from its axis and make it gaze from the edges. Pieces that work with that which is normally left out: peripheral territories, unpolished aesthetics, clumsy gestures full of intent. Instead of possessing an institutional lustre, here they are rough, precarious and strange in appearance, legitimate forms of making and showing culture. The idea is to think about what happens when central authority is displaced, when the ugly and the uncomfortable are not hidden, when they are recognised as part of the commons. Film that does not seek to be to one’s liking, but to open space and allow other ways of seeing and inhabiting the museum to enter stage.

Ordinary, Common and Public. Common Fixes for Ordinary Communities
Tuesday, 26, and Wednesday, 27 May 2026 – Check programme
Ordinary, Common and Public. Common Fixes for Ordinary Communities is the title of the fourteenth encounter run by Sociología Ordinaria, a transdisciplinary research group that explores daily knowledge deemed ordinary, superficial or frivolous from a traditional academic and intellectual viewpoint.
This latest edition seeks to approach and map connections between concepts of the commons and the public realm — remembering that the ordinary is also the commons — and to ensure affects and moods of discontent are mobilised towards hope.
By way of its multiple declinations — community, community-based practices, the commons, the communal — the encounter seeks to reflect on different ways of creating, (re)configuring, maintaining, fixing, arranging, caring for and defending the public realm and the commons. Furthermore, it explores forms of invocation and experimentation as tools opposite the helplessness of an uncertain present, in addition to resistance against attempts of expropriation, distortion, privatisation and touristification.

Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Sweet Revenge
26 MAY 2026
Nancy Spector and Alejandro Cesarco, curators of the exhibition Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Sweet Revenge, will speak with Manuel Segade, director of the Museo Reina Sofía, in a session dedicated to exploring the interpretive frameworks of this first large-scalepresentation in Madrid of the work of Felix Gonzalez-Torres (1957–1996), whose practice continues to resonate in the present.
The conversation begins with the exhibition’s title itself, Sweet Revenge, understood as a paradoxical notion that articulates much of the artist’s thinking. From there, the tensions running through his work are explored: the coexistence of opposing registers, ambiguity as a method, and the simultaneously affective and political charge of his works.
The dialogue also touches on some of the themes that run through his body of work, such as thenotions of identity, citizenship, and authority, alongside experiences linked to the AIDS crisis, and emotions such as love, loss, grief, and optimism. Special attention is given to the way in which Gonzalez-Torres shifts languages associated with Arte Povera, conceptualism, and minimalism towards open, participatory, and deeply personal structures.
The session also includes a reflection on the research process that shaped the exhibition, providing context for the curatorial decisions and criteria that structure it. In this context, Gonzalez-Torres’s work emerges as a device that actively engages those who activate orinterpret it, distributing responsibility for the production of meaning—a process that is alwaysunstable and constantly under negotiation.
These inaugural conversations, part of the main working strands of the Museo’s Public Programmes Area, aim to explore in greater depth the exhibition narratives of the shows organised by the Museo from the perspective of artists, curators and specialists.