-
February 20, 2013 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Faculty of Fine Arts
Table 1. Art Practices, Research and the University: R&D+innovation as a New Model of Knowledge
Location: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Faculty of Fine Arts
Coordinated by: Selina Blasco and Aurora Fernández Polanco
Participants: Fernando Baños, Carlos Fernández Pello, Beatriz Fernández Ruiz, Ricardo Horcajada, Lila Insúa, Josu Larrañaga, Juan Luis Moraza, Emilio Moreno, Jaime Munárriz, Victoria Pérez Royo, José Antonio Sánchez and Remedios ZafraSchedule:
10 a.m.- 2 p.m. Seminar for the members of the three groups comprising the platform “The education of the artist: research and academic capitalism.” Not open to the general public.
4 - 8 p.m. Round table
Open to the public -
June, 2013 Museo de la Universidad de Navarra
Table 2. Art Education in Modernity: From The Academy to the Pedagogical Models of the Avant-Gardes
Location: Museo de la Universidad de Navarra
Coordinated by: Carlos Chocarro and Jorge Fernández -
November 11, 2013 Museo Reina Sofía. Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Table 3. The Knowledge of Images: The Debate about Images and about Art as Knowledge
This table looks at the recent theoretical debate arising around the subject of the image, with special emphasis on the trends that defend an anthropological conception of the image – as an object and an act.
The table will review the disciplinary polemics of recent decades, basically those revolving around a new history of images, visual studies and iconic shift. At the same time, in a public colloquium, it intends to analyse the relationships between image and knowledge, between visual and textual discourse, and also the links that connect art to technique and scientific thought.
Coordinated by: José Díaz Cuyás and Esther Terrón
Program
10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. In-house seminar. Nouvel Building, Study Centre
Open only to the team and the members of the three groups that take part in this research platform.
4:00 p.m.- 8:00 p.m. Public round table. Nouvel Building, Auditorium 200
Moderated by : José D íaz Cuyás and Esther Terrón Participants: the guests - at the table - and members of the team from the audience.
Participants: Ana García Varas, Yaiza Hernández, Irene Kopelman, José Luis Pardo and Pedro G. Romero
The Education of the Artist: Research and Academic Capitalism

Held on 11 Nov 2013
In recent years, the education of the artist has become one of the most intractable problems being debated in the art world. Despite the seemingly permanent tension that has existed between educational institutions and the art scene throughout modern times, never before has it been so difficult to reach a consensus in the academic sphere about which theoretical and technical concepts an artist in training must develop. The difference lies in that nowadays it is no longer simply a matter of discussing educational programs; rather, the polemic exists at the heart of a situation whose traditionally unvarying elements are now in a situation of crisis and transformation. This is the case of the university as an institution, the state of academic disciplines, and artistic practice itself.
In this context, the current controversy regarding research and doctoral programs in the field of fine arts derives from a curricular problem that, in reality, has been affecting art studies since they were first incorporated into university curricula. It is significant that this situation, which has been latent for years, is now being presented as a new and urgent debate, just when RD+innovation has become the goal and the model of universal knowledge. Now, under the Bologna Plan, all academic areas or disciplines, including art, must engage in research guided by concepts of a certain technocratic semblance, as open to ideological interpretation, as the concepts of innovation and development.
Addressed as a cultural symptom, the dilemma of the artist as researcher finds itself at a crossroads: initially, it appears to be an academic and curricular issue, but due to its implications and repercussions, it calls for a re-examination of ideological and epistemological questions regarding the distinctive nature of art in today's world. Preliminary work in this area suggests that the complicated task of integrating art education into the new paradigm of R&D+innovation offers a critical perspective, an excellent vantage point for studying the contradictions not only within the emergent production of academic knowledge, but also within new artistic production.
Participants
Coordinators
Selina Blasco, Art History professor in the School of Fine Arts and Vice-Dean of University Outreach Programmes at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Carlos Chocarro, profesor in the Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura at the Universidad de Navarra.
José Díaz Cuyás, profesor of aesthetics at the Universidad de la Laguna.
Jorge Fernández Santos, researcher for the subprogramme Ramón y Cajal (Ministerio de Ciencia e Investigación, Madrid) appointed to the Universitat Jaume I de Castellón.
Aurora Fernández Polanco, tenured professor in the Department of Contemporary Art and Director of the Art History Department in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Esther Terrón, philosophy professor in Tenerife and docent in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad de La Laguna.
Participants (Table 1)
Fernando Baños, artist, researcher at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, and member of the R&D project Imágenes del arte y reescritura de las imágenes en la cultura visual global.
Carlos Fernández Pello, researcher and cultural producer, member of the collective Rampa.
Beatriz Fernández Ruiz, Art History professor in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Ricardo Horcajada, Director of the MIAC Master Program in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Lila Insua, professor of project guidance courses in the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Josu Larrañaga, Dean of the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Juan Luis Moraza, sculptor, tenured professor in the Sculpture Department of the School of Fine Arts at the Universidad de Vigo, and founding member of the collective CVA.
Emilio Moreno, Amsterdam-based artist and professor in Gerrit Rietveld Academy. He has recently exhibited his work in South African National Gallery (Cape Town), Casco (Utrecht), and Van Abbemuseum/ Onomatopee (Eindhoven).
Jaime Munárriz, Vice-Dean of Research and Post-Graduate Studies at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Victoria Pérez Royo, researcher for Artea, professor of aesthetics and art theory in the School of Philosophy at the Universidad de Zaragoza and co-Director of the Masters Program in Performing Arts Practices and Visual Culture.
José Antonio Sánchez, honorary professor in the Faculty of Fine Arts in Cuenca, co-Director of the Masters Program in Performing Practices and Visual Culture, and researcher for Artea.
Remedios Zafra, writer and tenured professor of art, innovation and digital culture at the Universidad de Sevilla and of politics of the gaze at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Director of the platform X0y1 for research and art practice on identity and network culture.
Más actividades

Dominga Sotomayor. Debajo and Thais Fujinaga. A Felicidade das Coisas
Friday 14 August 2026
Two gems, from two new voices in Latin American cinema, which swing between families, swimming pools, reencounters and status. In Debajo, a short film on youth by Chilean director Dominga Sotomayor, an abstract yet powerful bird’s-eye view of a swimming pool co-exists with the relationships of a crisis-stricken family, gathered to see an eclipse. Sotomayor’s distinctive film-making of care and affects shares a similar space to the daily naturalism of Thais Fujinaga’s A Felicidade das Coisas. In the director’s first feature film, the swimming pool is not a horizontal basin for swimmers’ immersion; rather it is a huge vertical monolith, a kind of an anti-monument, anchored in the garden of a middle-class family. The film conveys the efforts and challenges of a mother of two children to build a swimming pool in their modest summer house, a mother who, alone, comes up against a hypermasculine world. Equally, the film speaks of family love, and the search for status, with the swimming pool a languishing totem of the Brazilian middle class during the years of Bolsonarism.
![Blake Edwards, The Party [El guateque], 1968, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-14.jpg.webp)
Blake Edwards. The Party
Saturday, 15 August 2026
In The Party, actor Hrundi V. Bakshi (Peter Sellers) is mistakenly invited to a glamorous dinner party in Hollywood. His curiosity and two left feet lead to one funny mishap after the other. During the soiree he consoles Michèle, a young actress who has been fired by her producer, and the chaos gathers momentum when Bakshi accidentally opens a retractable floor, making the guests fall into a swimming pool. A small hippie-style elephant gatecrashes the party, brought by a group of young people, and Bakshi asks the guests to wash the elephant as it is a sacred animal in his country. The house fills with soap suds, culminating in a wackily chaotic party.
When Stanley Kubrick was once asked who Peter Sellers was, he replied: “There is no such person as Peter Sellers”. The Party is one of the most widely recognised comedies in the history of film, its director Blake Edwards and the English actor making an entertaining critique of a fading conservative society. The cultural revolutions of the 1960s fit into the container of a choppy swimming pool: people from high society, an elephant, a Russian ballet, waiters, beatnik youth… similar to Sellers’s own identity: an empty vessel that can be refilled. In the film, Edwards tapped into the ingenious actor’s innate improvisation and the swimming pool as a container for revolutionary intent.

Lucrecia Martel. La ciénaga (The Swamp)
Viernes 21 de agosto, 2026
A couple of families spend the summer in a country cottage. The relationship between them exposes a crisis. The alcoholism of Mecha (Graciela Borges) and Gregorio (Martín Adjemián) becomes clear, leading to a drift in the education of their children and impacting relationships of respect and affect. Weariness expresses the lackadaisical environment.
In La ciénaga Lucrecia Martel approaches the decadence of a middle-class Argentinian family. The pool of dirty, stagnant water reflects the economic and social collapse of a whole country, yet reflects more than economic crisis as it becomes a murky well feeding off the pain of those living in the house. An erstwhile space of joy, the swimming pool becomes a reflection of adult depression, resulting in apathy. And the children, especially the girls, seem to be the only people awake in this drift. Barring a flicker of unawareness, the young people immerse themselves in rainwater or the water from the river, in water that flows, but are cautious of getting too close to the swimming pool.
![Yorgos Lanthimos, Kynodontas [Canino], 2009, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-16_00.jpg.webp)
Yorgos Lanthimos. Dogtooth
Saturday, 22 August 2026
A couple with three adult children live in a modern country cottage. A large swimming pool takes centre stage in a sizeable garden. The property is skirted by a large fence that blocks a view of the outside. Here, the father has educated his children without outside contact, maintaining their belief in a false world: aeroplanes fall in the garden like toys and they must act like dogs to defend themselves from the ferocious cats that surround the house. The promise of going out into the world when they lose their dogtooth is proof of their maturity.
Lanthimos builds a world that is surreal, comical and terrible. The swimming pool is the house’s central element, a limited, controlled space assimilated like the sea, yet under the father’s supervision. A space of imagination, but with sinister intentions: the children are indoctrinated under the water as they believe in a better world. Far from reality. The swimming pool’s limits are the limits of their freedom, a false state of well-being expressed in the weightless bodies in the water. The liquid element is an analgesic magma with the power to educate offspring under the latent fear of a shark bite.
![Binka Zhelyazkova, Baseynat [La piscina], 1977, película](https://recursos.museoreinasofia.es/styles/small_landscape/public/Actividades/ciclocine-piscinas-17_00.png.webp)
Binka Zhelyazkova. The Swimming Pool
Viernes 28 de agosto, 2026
The young, bright Bella (Yanina Kasheva), after unforeseen heartbreak at her graduation party, meets Apostol (Kosta Tsonev), a reserved architect, and Boyan (Kliment Denchev), a comedy actor who is cynical about his country. The three characters climb up to a diving board in a municipal swimming pool, where they begin a strange relationship of friendship, love and despair which reflects a generational clash.
Binka Zhelyazkova, the great enfant terrible of Eastern European cinema, critic of the communist system and widely acclaimed film-maker beyond Bulgarian borders, made in The Swimming Pool a masterly metaphor for a country in decline. The public pool symbolises a closed, immovable enclosure where society is festering. From the height of a diving board she sees, in a panoptic view, the different generations living underneath a limited space. On one side, older people attempt to preserve the old revolutionary spirit with constant collective swimming exercises while, on the other, young people don’t hide the desire for freedom that remains unrealised. The result is an ideological clash in how to act and move in the enclosure, unearthing vast hypocrisy in the lost ideals of socialism, reflected in the total apathy of youth. The Swimming Pool for Zhelyazkova is a reflection of the disillusionment and existential void of a whole country and system.